SCR Mixing Pipe Layout for Additive Vaporization and Deposit Control

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing systems for exhaust gas treatment in diesel engines face issues with the precipitation of additives before vaporization, leading to inefficient nitrogen oxide reduction in selective catalytic reduction devices.

Innovation Solution

A mixing device is installed upstream of the selective catalytic reduction device, featuring a tilted upper pipe segment and baffle/trapping plates to facilitate vaporization of additives by enhancing contact with exhaust gas heat and preventing precipitation.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Device complexity

If a vertical overflow pipe is used to route exhaust gas, then the结构简单 (structure is simple), but liquid additive forms a liquid film that flows down and precipitates before vaporization

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvestructure complexityVSAvoidadditive vaporization efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent introduces asymmetry by tilting the upper pipe segment at a specific angle (α) relative to the vertical direction. This asymmetric orientation prevents the liquid film from flowing straight down the pipe wall, instead causing it to accumulate and vaporize on the inner circumferential surface facing the blowing section, thereby resolving the precipitation problem while maintaining structural simplicity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #4Asymmetry

Solution Approach 2:

The patent adds a dimensional element by inclining the pipe segment rather than keeping it purely vertical. This dimensional change in orientation creates a new vaporization zone on the pipe's inner surface, transforming the problem from a vertical flow issue to a controlled surface vaporization process

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

2Reliability

If the upper pipe segment is tilted to prevent liquid film flow, then additive precipitation is suppressed, but the device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveadditive vaporization efficiencyVSAvoidstructure complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies local quality by tilting only the upper pipe segment while keeping the lower pipe segment vertical. This localized modification achieves the vaporization function where needed without unnecessarily complicating the entire pipe structure, balancing reliability improvement with device simplicity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes the orientation parameter of the upper pipe segment from vertical to inclined at angle α. This parameter modification fundamentally alters the liquid film behavior to enable vaporization, achieving improved reliability through a simple geometric parameter change rather than complex mechanical additions

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The device ensures effective vaporization of additives, reducing nitrogen oxides efficiently by suppressing precipitation and ensuring uniform mixing of ammonia in the exhaust gas.

Implementation Method 1

facilitate vaporization of additives by enhancing contact with exhaust gas heat

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectHeat transfer: Conduction (thermal)

Implementation Method 2

an injector attached to the case, the injector injecting a liquid additive

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectFluid spray: Fluid Spray

Implementation Method 3

the upper pipe segment being tilted relative to the vertical direction so that the more the upper pipe segment goes vertically downward, the closer it gets to the blowing section

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectGravity: Gravitation

Implementation Method 4

ammonia needs to be produced by hydrolysis or thermal decomposition of the gaseous additive

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectThermal decomposition: Pyrolysis

Implementation Method 5

ammonia needs to be produced by hydrolysis or thermal decomposition of the gaseous additive

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectHydrolysis: Hydrolysis

Data Source

PatentEP4242435B1Mixing device
Publication Date: 2026.03.11 TOKYO ROKI CO LTD
  • EP4242435B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP4242435B1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP4242435B1 patent drawingFigure 3

AI summary

To facilitate the vaporization of additives added upstream of a selective catalytic reduction device and to suppress their precipitation. A mixing device includes: a case surrounding a blowing section, through which an exhaust gas is blown out, of a filter or a catalyst; an upper pipe segment having an opening formed therein, the opening facing a direction facing the blowing section, the upper pipe segment being tilted relative to the vertical direction so that the more the upper pipe segment goes vertically downward, the closer it gets to the blowing section in a region facing the blowing section within the case; a lower pipe segment bent from a lower end of the upper pipe segment, the lower pipe segment being tilted relative to the vertical direction so that the more the lower pipe segment goes vertically downward, the further away it gets from the blowing section, the lower pipe segment extending out from the case and being connected to a selective catalytic reduction device; and an injector attached to the case, the injector injecting a liquid additive toward an area faced by the opening, the area being located outside the upper pipe segment in the case.