Active Shock Train Control in Scramjet Isolators

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Scramjet engines face challenges in controlling shock train length, which can lead to unstart events, especially at hypersonic conditions, causing loss of vehicle control and requiring significant isolator length margins that increase engine size, weight, and drag.

Innovation Solution

A system that includes sensors to detect pressure changes and a processor to determine shock train position, coupled with a shock train fuel injector to modulate fuel flow and control back pressure, allowing for active control of the shock train within the isolator to prevent unstart.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If the isolator length is increased to prevent unstart events, then the reliability is improved, but the weight and drag increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveunstart preventionVSAvoidengine weight
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSWeight of stationary object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies active flow control to dynamically adjust the shock train position within the isolator. By using actuators to modify the flow field in real-time, the system can prevent unstart events with a shorter isolator than would be required for passive designs. This dynamic control allows the isolator to maintain reliability while reducing its length, weight, and drag.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system employs feedback control mechanisms that monitor shock train position and adjust flow control actuators accordingly. This closed-loop control enables the isolator to actively respond to changing flight conditions, maintaining shock train containment with reduced margin requirements compared to passive designs, thereby reducing isolator length while preserving unstart prevention capability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Reliability

If the isolator length is increased to constrain shock train, then the reliability is improved, but the engine size increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveshock train containmentVSAvoidisolator length
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLength of moving object

Solution Approach 1:

Active flow control dynamically manages shock train position throughout the isolator, allowing shorter isolator designs to maintain shock train containment. The system adjusts flow parameters in real-time to prevent shock train propagation beyond the isolator, eliminating the need for excessive length margins required by passive designs.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes flow parameters (such as pressure, temperature, or velocity) through active control mechanisms to influence shock train behavior. By modifying these parameters dynamically, the system can constrain the shock train within a shorter isolator length, reducing overall engine size while maintaining reliability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Reliability

If the isolator length is increased to prevent unstart, then the reliability is improved, but the drag increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveunstart preventionVSAvoiddrag
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSObject-generated harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

Active flow control dynamically manages the shock train to prevent unstart events within a compact isolator configuration. This reduces the isolator length required compared to passive designs, thereby reducing the drag generated by the engine while maintaining unstart prevention capability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

By actively modifying flow parameters through control actuators, the system can maintain shock train containment with a shorter isolator. This reduces the parasitic drag associated with a longer isolator while preserving the reliability needed to prevent unstart events.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The system effectively constrains the shock train within the isolator, reducing the need for excess length, improving engine performance, efficiency, and reducing weight by enabling timely control of shock train position, thus preventing unstart events and enhancing vehicle control.

Implementation Method 1

sensors configured to sense a pressure change generated by a shock train in the isolator

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectPressure change detection: Pressure Gradient

Implementation Method 2

shock train fuel injector to modulate fuel flow to the engine to control back pressure

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectFuel flow modulation: Injector

Implementation Method 3

pre-combustion pressure rise from the inlet conditions to the backpressure imposed by heat release in the combustor. This diffusion process is accomplished through a series of normal or oblique shock waves

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectShock wave compression: Shock Wave

Data Source

PatentUS11384712B1Active control of scramjet isolator shock systems
Publication Date: 2022.07.12 GENERAL ELECTRIC CO
  • US11384712B1 patent drawing
  • US11384712B1 patent drawing
  • US11384712B1 patent drawing

AI summary

This disclosure relates to a system for actively controlling shock train in a high speed, air-breathing propulsion engine. The system includes an isolator, a sensor associated with the isolator, and a shock train fuel injector in electrical communication with the sensor. The sensor is configured to sense changes in pressure generated by a shock train in the isolator. The shock train fuel injector is in electrical communication with the sensor. The shock train fuel injector is configured to modulate fuel flow to the engine to control back pressure produced by the engine in response to predetermined pressure changes in the shock train.