Scratching Detection System Using Acceleration Analysis

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing scratching detection systems are not capable of accurately detecting scratching behavior, particularly in humans, due to limitations in movement measurement and analysis.

Innovation Solution

A scratching detection system comprising a sensor and a processor that detects acceleration corresponding to hand movement, outputs a signal with detected values, and uses multiple parameters such as occurrence count and consecutive count to accurately identify scratching behavior.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If simple movement measurement is used to monitor itchiness, then the system is easy to operate, but the measurement precision is insufficient

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvescratching behavior detection accuracyVSAvoiddetection system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the scratching detection process into multiple independent parameters: occurrence count (how many times acceleration exceeds threshold), consecutive count (maximum continuous exceedances), and cycle-based analysis. Each parameter is calculated separately and then integrated to improve overall detection accuracy without requiring complex hardware modifications.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes the analytical parameters from simple movement detection to multi-dimensional acceleration analysis. By introducing occurrence count, consecutive count, and cycle-based parameter calculations, the system transforms raw acceleration data into meaningful behavioral indicators, significantly improving scratching detection precision.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Measurement precision

If multiple parameters are used to detect scratching behavior, then the measurement precision improves, but the calculation complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvescratching behavior detection accuracyVSAvoidparameter analysis complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDifficulty of detecting and measuring

Solution Approach 1:

The patent divides the analysis into discrete, manageable segments: first cycle signal acquisition, threshold comparison operations, occurrence count calculation, consecutive count determination, and second cycle integration. This segmentation makes the complex multi-parameter analysis systematically manageable and computationally efficient.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system uses the acceleration signal itself to generate all necessary parameters without external intervention. The occurrence count, consecutive count, and cycle parameters are all derived automatically from the raw sensor data through predefined algorithms, reducing the need for complex external analysis tools.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

3Measurement precision

If acceleration-based movement detection is used, then the device complexity remains low, but the measurement precision for scratching behavior is insufficient

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvehand movement detection accuracyVSAvoidsensor system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent transforms simple acceleration magnitude detection into sophisticated scratching behavior analysis by introducing cycle-based parameters, occurrence counts, and consecutive count metrics. These parameter transformations extract meaningful behavioral patterns from basic acceleration data, achieving high precision with minimal hardware complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces complex mechanical or optical scratching detection mechanisms with simple acceleration sensing combined with sophisticated signal analysis. The accelerometer-based system, when paired with multi-parameter computational analysis, substitutes for more complex mechanical switches, pressure sensors, or visual monitoring systems.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The system effectively enhances the accuracy of scratching behavior detection, allowing for more reliable monitoring and analysis of scratching activities.

Implementation Method 1

a sensor configured to detect an acceleration corresponding to a movement of a hand of a person

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectAcceleration detection: Accelerometer

Data Source

PatentEP4247252B1Scratching detection system
Publication Date: 2025.05.07 NAOS
  • EP4247252B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP4247252B1 patent drawingFigure 2A~2C
  • EP4247252B1 patent drawingFigure 3A~3C

AI summary

[Technical Problem] Embodiments provide a scratching detection system in which scratching behavior can be more accurately detected. [Solution to Problem] According to an embodiment, a scratching detection system includes a sensor, and a processor. The sensor is configured to detect an acceleration corresponding to a movement of a hand of a person and is configured to output a first signal including a detected value corresponding to the acceleration in a first cycle. The processor is configured to acquire the first signal and to detect an existence or absence of a scratching behavior of the person in a second cycle based on a plurality of parameters. The second cycle includes a plurality of the first intervals. The plurality of parameters includes a first occurrence count and a first consecutive count. The first occurrence count is a number of times that an absolute value of the detected value exceeds a threshold value in the second cycle. The first consecutive count is a maximum value of a number of times that the absolute value of the detected value consecutively exceeds the threshold value in the second cycle.