Screen Blockage Measurement and Flow Optimization

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current screening systems in water and wastewater treatment inefficiently manage debris blockage due to reliance on simple level differential measurements, leading to excessive running and solids bypass, as they do not account for fluid velocity and its impact on screening.

Innovation Solution

A system that continuously monitors the change in blocked area and flow velocity through a screening device, using upstream and downstream level detectors and flow determining devices to calculate percent blockage and velocity, triggering appropriate actions such as cleaning cycles, speed adjustments, or alarms based on predetermined thresholds.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Device complexity

If simple level differential measurement is used to control screen operation, then device complexity is reduced, but productivity decreases due to excessive running and inefficient debris management

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecontrol system complexityVSAvoidscreening efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The system implements continuous feedback by monitoring both level differential and flow rate, calculating percent blockage in real-time, and adjusting screen operation accordingly. This feedback mechanism prevents excessive running by only activating cleaning when actual blockage thresholds are exceeded, thereby improving productivity without requiring overly complex control systems.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces simple mechanical level sensing with a hybrid system that incorporates flow rate measurement and computational blockage calculation. This substitution of mechanical control with a more intelligent measurement-and-calculation approach resolves the contradiction by providing accurate productivity optimization while maintaining reasonable device complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

2Reliability

If screen operates frequently based on predetermined timers, then reliability of debris removal is improved, but loss of energy increases due to unnecessary running

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedebris removal reliabilityVSAvoidenergy consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of energy

Solution Approach 1:

The system dynamically adjusts screen operation based on real-time conditions by calculating percent blockage using both level differential and flow rate. Instead of fixed timer-based operation, the system activates cleaning only when calculated blockage exceeds thresholds, ensuring reliable debris removal while minimizing energy waste from unnecessary operations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes the control parameter from fixed time intervals to dynamic percent blockage calculation that incorporates flow rate variations. This parameter change allows the system to maintain reliable debris removal by responding to actual blockage conditions while reducing energy loss by avoiding cleaning operations during low-flow or low-blockage periods.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Object-affected harmful factors

If screen is cleaned too frequently, then object-affected harmful factors are reduced by preventing solids bypass, but loss of time increases due to excessive cleaning cycles

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesolids bypassVSAvoidcleaning cycle time
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-affected harmful factorsVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system uses continuous feedback from level and flow rate sensors to calculate percent blockage in real-time, enabling timely detection of actual blockage conditions. This feedback mechanism prevents solids bypass by triggering cleaning only when necessary, thereby reducing harmful effects without wasting time on excessive cleaning cycles.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs preliminary blockage assessment by continuously monitoring level differential and flow rate before initiating cleaning. This preliminary action allows the system to predict when blockage will reach critical levels, preventing solids bypass while avoiding premature cleaning operations that would waste time.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

4Object-affected harmful factors

If finer screening is implemented to capture higher levels of debris, then object-affected harmful factors are reduced, but headloss increases due to reduced open area

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedebris capture levelVSAvoidheadloss
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-affected harmful factorsVSStress or pressure

Solution Approach 1:

The system maintains continuous monitoring of level differential and flow rate to detect blockage conditions in real-time. This continuity enables prompt cleaning activation when finer screens become blocked, preventing excessive headloss buildup while maintaining the beneficial debris capture capability throughout operation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #20Continuity of useful action

Solution Approach 2:

The feedback mechanism continuously assesses the trade-off between debris capture and headloss by monitoring level differential and flow rate. When blockage thresholds are exceeded, the system activates cleaning to restore open area, thereby maintaining effective debris capture while preventing excessive headloss from accumulating on finer screens.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Data Source

PatentUS7854850B2Screen blockage measurement and flow performance optimization system
Publication Date: 2010.12.21 SULZER MANAGEMENT AG
  • US7854850B2 patent drawing
  • US7854850B2 patent drawing
  • US7854850B2 patent drawing

AI summary

An apparatus and method are provided that enable the control of a screening operation based on a calculated screen blockage percentage and the velocity throughput of the screen. The apparatus includes an upstream level detector, a downstream level detector and a flow determining device which determines the volumetric flow through the screen. The apparatus may further include a blockage determination unit which determines the percent screen blockage based on the flow level upstream of the screen, the flow level downstream of the screen and the volumetric flow.