Screen Defect Detection Model Selection for Reliable Production Use

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Deploying a trained deep learning model in a production line for screen defect detection is challenging due to equipment, parameter, and environmental interference, affecting the prediction effect and requiring manual intervention for defect classification.

Innovation Solution

A method for determining a target model involves acquiring a sample data set, dividing it into training and verification sets, training multiple models, testing them, and selecting the best model based on verification and offline test results, adjusting confidence thresholds, and deploying the model only when meeting predetermined criteria.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If a deep learning model is deployed for screen defect detection, then manual workload is reduced and efficiency increases, but the prediction effect is affected by equipment, parameter, and environmental interference

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedefect detection efficiencyVSAvoidprediction accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies preliminary action by conducting extensive model training and verification before deployment. Multiple models are trained with different parameters, and their predictions are verified against ground truth data. The best model is selected based on verification results, ensuring optimal performance before actual production use. This preliminary preparation mitigates the reliability issues that would otherwise occur during production due to environmental interference.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements feedback mechanisms by comparing model predictions with ground truth data during verification. The verification results are used to evaluate model performance and guide model selection. This feedback loop ensures that only models meeting accuracy requirements are deployed, maintaining high reliability while achieving automated defect detection.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Measurement precision

If multiple models are trained and verified to ensure accurate defect classification, then detection accuracy improves, but training time and computational resources increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedefect classification accuracyVSAvoidmodel training time
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies segmentation by dividing the model development process into distinct phases: training multiple models with different parameters, verifying each model against ground truth data, and selecting the best model based on verification results. This segmented approach allows systematic evaluation of different model configurations to achieve accurate defect classification while managing training time through structured parallel processing.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent utilizes parameter changes by training models with different hyperparameters and configuration settings. By varying training parameters and comparing verification results, the system identifies optimal parameter combinations that achieve high classification accuracy. This approach enables finding the best model efficiently without exhaustive searching of all possible parameter spaces.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Data Source

PatentUS12602910B2Method for detecting defect and method for training model
Publication Date: 2026.04.14 BEIJING ZHONGXIANGYING TECH CO LTD
  • US12602910B2 patent drawing
  • US12602910B2 patent drawing
  • US12602910B2 patent drawing

AI summary

The present disclosure provides a method and device for detecting an image category. The method includes: acquiring a sample data set including a plurality of sample images labeled with a category, the sample data set including a training data set and a verification data set; training a deep learning model using the training data set to obtain, according to different numbers of training rounds, at least two trained models; testing the at least two trained models using the verification data set to generate a verification test result; generating, based on the verification test result, a verification test index; determining, according to the verification test index, a target model from the at least two trained models; and predict a to-be-tested image of the target object using the target model to obtain the category of the to-be-tested image.