Screen Printer Control Parameter Generation Using Simulation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Screen printers often print either too much or too little solder paste on printed circuit board pads or place it at inappropriate positions due to inadequate control parameters, and ambient conditions like temperature and humidity can lead to defects in the solder printing process.

Innovation Solution

An apparatus and method using a simulation model trained to predict solder paste states, combined with optimization, search, and machine learning-based reinforcement learning algorithms to generate control parameters for the screen printer, which adjusts parameters like squeegee blade pressure, speed, and stencil separation speed to improve printing accuracy.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Manufacturing precision

If control parameters of the screen printer are not optimized, then the printing process is simple and fast, but the manufacturing precision of solder paste deposition is poor

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesolder paste deposition precisionVSAvoidcontrol parameter generation system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary simulation and prediction of solder paste printing outcomes before actual printing. The simulation model predicts printing results based on control parameters, and the inspection information is analyzed in advance to determine optimal parameters, preventing defects before they occur.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent creates a virtual copy of the printing process through simulation models. Virtual solder pastes are generated by applying control parameters to the simulation model, allowing prediction and optimization of actual printing outcomes without performing the physical printing process repeatedly.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

2Manufacturing precision

If multiple algorithms are used to generate control parameters, then the manufacturing precision improves, but the productivity decreases due to complex calculations

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecontrol parameter accuracyVSAvoidparameter generation speed
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The system segments the parameter generation process into distinct algorithmic components. Multiple algorithms (optimization, search, and reinforcement learning) generate candidate parameters independently, which are then evaluated and selected, allowing parallel processing and efficient resource utilization.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system dynamically changes and adjusts control parameters based on simulation results and inspection information. The reinforcement learning algorithm continuously optimizes parameters by learning from predicted outcomes, adapting the parameter set to achieve optimal printing precision.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Reliability

If control parameters do not account for ambient conditions, then the operation is simple, but the reliability of solder paste printing deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprinting quality consistencyVSAvoidenvironmental monitoring and adjustment system
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system incorporates feedback loops where inspection information from actual printing is analyzed, compared with simulation predictions, and used to adjust control parameters. This closed-loop feedback ensures that ambient condition variations are compensated for, maintaining consistent printing quality.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The control parameters are made dynamic rather than static. The system continuously adapts parameters based on real-time inspection information and simulation predictions, allowing the printing process to respond to changing ambient conditions and maintain reliability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Data Source

PatentEP3530463B1Apparatus and method of generating control parameter of screen printer
Publication Date: 2024.09.11 KOHYOUNG TECH
  • EP3530463B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP3530463B1 patent drawingFigure 2A~2B
  • EP3530463B1 patent drawingFigure 2C~2D

AI summary

An apparatus, a recording medium, and a method for generating a control parameter of a screen printer (110) are disclosed. The apparatus includes a memory (122) that stores a simulation model configured to derive predictive inspection information on a printed state of solder paste based on a plurality of control parameters of the screen printer; a communication circuit (123) configured to receive first inspection information on a plurality of solder pastes printed by the screen printer based on a first control parameter, and a processor (124) electrically connected to the memory and the communication circuit. The processor obtains first predictive inspection information by applying the first control parameter to the simulation model, generates a plurality of candidate control parameters based on the first predictive inspection information, determines a plurality of second control parameters among the candidate control parameters, and transmits the plurality of second control parameters to the screen printer via the communication circuit.