Screen Saver Control Using User Intent and Application State
Find Innovative SolutionsGenerate Solutions
Solution Overview
Problem
Existing display apparatuses operate screen savers irrespective of user intention and operation state, causing inconvenience and inefficiency in power management.
Innovation Solution
A display apparatus that operates a screen saver based on user intention and current state, using a processor to count time, identify application state information, and adjust settings to accept or ignore reset requests from applications.
Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles
Engineering Contradiction Analysis
1Loss of energy
If a screen saver operates irrespective of user intention or apparatus operation state, then power consumption is reduced and display lifespan is extended, but user convenience deteriorates and operational complexity increases
Solution Approach 1:
The system continuously monitors apparatus operation state and user input status, using this feedback to dynamically determine whether to activate the screen saver. The processor detects whether the apparatus is in standby mode and whether user input has been received within a predetermined time period, adjusting screen saver operation accordingly to balance power savings with user convenience.
Solution Approach 2:
The system automatically determines and executes screen saver operation without requiring explicit user commands. The processor self-manages the decision-making process by monitoring operation state and user input, activating the screen saver autonomously when conditions are met, thereby reducing user burden while maintaining power efficiency.
2Loss of energy
If a screen saver operates irrespective of user intention or apparatus operation state, then power consumption is reduced and display lifespan is extended, but system complexity increases
Solution Approach 1:
The system uses feedback from operation state monitoring and user input detection to automatically control screen saver activation. This feedback mechanism simplifies control logic by relying on observable system states rather than complex user intent analysis, reducing overall system complexity while achieving power savings.
Solution Approach 2:
The processor acts as an intermediary that mediates between the display apparatus operation state and screen saver activation. It receives input status information, processes this information against predetermined time criteria, and controls screen saver operation accordingly, simplifying the control architecture by centralizing decision-making in a single component.
3Adaptability or versatility
If inquiry method is used to determine screen saver operation, then user intention can be considered, but monitoring complexity increases
Solution Approach 1:
Instead of active inquiry, the system uses passive feedback by monitoring user input status and apparatus operation state. This feedback approach recognizes user intention implicitly through the absence or presence of input signals, eliminating the need for complex inquiry mechanisms while still adapting to user needs.
Solution Approach 2:
The system self-determines user intention by monitoring its own operation state and receiving input status information, eliminating the need for external inquiry processes. The processor autonomously interprets user intent through the presence or absence of input signals within the predetermined time period, simplifying the overall system architecture.
Data Source
AI summary
A display apparatus is provided. The display apparatus includes a display and a processor configured to count time for operating a screen saver after a user input is received, and based on the counted time corresponding to a threshold time, control the display to display a screen corresponding to the screen saver by operating the screen saver.