Screw-Based Retractor for Minimally Invasive Spine Surgery

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current minimally invasive spine surgery techniques face challenges in maintaining small incisions and achieving adequate access for rod introduction during spinal fusions, often requiring additional incisions or larger incisions, which limits the procedure's minimally invasive nature and flexibility.

Innovation Solution

A minimally invasive screw-based retractor system that is removably attached to pedicle bone screws, allowing for polyaxial rotation and expansion, enabling multiple retraction directions and facilitating the insertion of instruments and implants while maintaining a small incision size.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Area of stationary object

If standard hand-held surgical retractors are used, then the incision can be kept small, but manual manipulation is required to maintain placement, occupying one hand of the physician

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveincision sizeVSAvoidmanual manipulation requirement
Core Design Contradiction:
Area of stationary objectVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The retractor system attaches itself to the pedicle screw that is already in place, eliminating the need for manual holding. The screw acts as an anchor point, allowing the retractor to maintain its position autonomously during the procedure.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The retractor is divided into separate components: a retractor body with blades and a separate attachment mechanism that connects to the pedicle screw. This segmentation allows the retractor to be positioned and secured independently without requiring continuous manual manipulation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

2Ease of operation

If typical retractors are levered back to hold the wound open, then access is maintained, but they frequently require re-positioning if they dislodge or obstruct the physician's view

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvewound accessVSAvoidre-positioning time
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The retractor is pre-attached to the pedicle screw before the surgical procedure begins. This preliminary attachment ensures that the retractor is already in the correct position and secured, eliminating the need for re-positioning during the procedure.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The retractor is designed as a disposable device that is attached to a single-use or implantable pedicle screw. This combination provides stable, long-lasting fixation without the need for re-positioning, and the disposable nature ensures sterility and eliminates cleaning/maintenance time.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #27Cheap short-living objects (Disposable)

3Area of stationary object

If a single small incision is used for rod introduction, then minimally invasive benefits are maintained, but access and visibility are extremely limited

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveincision sizeVSAvoidaccess and visibility
Core Design Contradiction:
Area of stationary objectVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The retractor blades can be spread apart in multiple directions (cephalad-caudal, medial-lateral, anterior-posterior) to create a three-dimensional working space through a single small incision. This multi-directional expansion provides extensive access and visibility without requiring multiple incisions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

Solution Approach 2:

The retractor is designed with movable blades that can be dynamically adjusted and spread to different positions. This dynamic capability allows the surgical field to be expanded and reconfigured as needed during the procedure, providing versatile access through a single incision.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

4Object-affected harmful factors

If multiple small incisions are used instead of one large incision, then post-operative pain and recovery time are reduced, but the need for extensive tissue and muscle retraction remains

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepost-operative painVSAvoidtissue retraction requirement
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-affected harmful factorsVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The retractor combines multiple functions into a single device: it provides retraction, maintains incision patency, and facilitates rod introduction all through one small incision site. This consolidation eliminates the need for multiple incisions and extensive tissue retraction while maintaining all necessary surgical capabilities.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Data Source

PatentUS9510858B2Minimally invasive retractor and methods of use
Publication Date: 2016.12.06 VB SPINE LLC
  • US9510858B2 patent drawing
  • US9510858B2 patent drawing
  • US9510858B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A device, system and method for orthopedic spine surgery using a novel screw-based retractor, disclosed herein, that allows for access to the spine through a minimally or less invasive approach. The retractor device is designed to be coupled to a pedicle screw and then to have opposed arms of the retractor spread apart to open the wound proximally. The retractor is removed by pulling it out of the wound whereby the retractor is deformed to pass over the pedicle screw head. The retractor is intended to be made of a stiff plastic material, sterile packaged and disposable after one use. A system and method for using the retractor and performing a minimally invasive spine surgical procedure are also disclosed.