Screw Compressor Element T-Shape Inlet Design

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Screw compressors face inefficiencies due to mixing losses caused by turbulence in the inlet opening, particularly at high rotor speeds, and existing solutions either compromise mechanical strength or are difficult to realize, such as the 'delta shape' which is rarely used due to its complexity and the need for large diameters.

Innovation Solution

A screw compressor design featuring an inlet opening with an axial section extending along the cylindrical walls and a transverse section that connects to the end face, forming a T-shape, which reduces mixing losses while maintaining mechanical strength and ease of construction, allowing optimal filling of spaces between helical rotors.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If a large inlet opening is used to optimally fill the spaces between the lobes of the helical rotors, then the filling efficiency is improved, but the mechanical strength of the housing is negatively affected

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefilling efficiencyVSAvoidmechanical strength of housing
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSStrength

Solution Approach 1:

The inlet opening is divided into two distinct sections: an axial section that extends in the axial direction and a transverse section that extends in the radial direction. This segmentation allows each section to perform its specific function - the axial section provides structural support while the transverse section optimizes gas flow into the rotor chambers, thereby resolving the contradiction between maintaining mechanical strength and achieving high filling efficiency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

2Productivity

If an axial inlet opening is used to supply gas to the rotor chambers, then the gas supply in the axial direction is improved, but the complexity and rotor shaft length are increased

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvegas supply efficiencyVSAvoidcomplexity and rotor shaft length
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The inlet opening is segmented into axial and transverse sections, where the axial section provides the necessary gas supply path while the transverse section extends the opening to improve filling without requiring longer rotor shafts or additional complexity in the bearing and seal arrangements.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

3Ease of manufacture

If a radial inlet opening is used to supply gas to the rotor chambers, then the ease of realization and accessibility for maintenance are improved, but the filling efficiency may be compromised

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveease of realization and maintenance accessibilityVSAvoidfilling efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The invention merges the advantages of both axial and radial inlet openings by combining an axial section (which provides good gas supply efficiency) with a transverse section (which provides radial accessibility and ease of realization). This hybrid configuration achieves optimal filling efficiency while maintaining the ease of manufacture and maintenance accessibility associated with radial openings.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

4Strength

If the inlet opening is reduced in size to maintain mechanical strength, then the housing strength is preserved, but mixing losses increase due to turbulence

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemechanical strength of housingVSAvoidmixing losses
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSLoss of energy

Solution Approach 1:

The segmented inlet opening design allows the axial section to maintain structural integrity and mechanical strength, while the transverse section is specifically optimized to guide gas flow and reduce turbulence. This segmentation enables the structure to remain strong while the flow path is designed to minimize mixing losses.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

5Loss of energy

If partitions or ribs are added to guide gas flow and reduce mixing losses, then the energy efficiency is improved, but the flow resistance increases and manufacturing complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemixing lossesVSAvoidmanufacturing complexity and flow resistance
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of energyVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

Instead of adding multiple partitions or ribs to guide flow, the invention uses a single segmented inlet opening configuration with axial and transverse sections. This segmentation inherently guides the gas flow along an optimized path without requiring additional flow-guiding elements, thereby reducing manufacturing complexity and flow resistance while still minimizing mixing losses.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Data Source

PatentUS10371149B2Screw compressor element
Publication Date: 2019.08.06 ATLAS COPCO AIRPOWER NV
  • US10371149B2 patent drawing
  • US10371149B2 patent drawing
  • US10371149B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A screw compressor element with a housing and two screw rotors that are affixed in the housing in a double cylindrical chamber provided to this end, whereby the housing is provided with an inlet opening on the inlet side of the screw compressor element, whereby the inlet opening extends in the cylindrical walls of the double cylindrical chamber with at least a section that extends in an axial direction, and a transverse section connecting thereto in the form of a strip that extends from the axial section on the inlet side to a side of the section in a direction transverse to the axial direction.