Semiconductor Layout Test Arrays for Scribe-Line Pattern Optimization

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

The semiconductor industry faces challenges in optimizing layout patterns due to inconsistencies caused by the optical proximity effect, leading to delays and inefficiencies in the development process, as current methods rely heavily on experience and trial-and-error, and test patterns in chip regions can be inaccurate and resource-intensive.

Innovation Solution

A method involving the generation of adjusted patterns and a layout optimization test group with multiple clusters of test pattern arrays, differing in capacity, which are formed on a wafer and subjected to electrical inspection to determine the best manufacturing solution, allowing for real-time optimization and reduced development time.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If test patterns are formed in chip regions of wafer for CP test, then electrical issues can be evaluated, but it occupies valuable estate in chip regions and delays development process

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveelectrical issue evaluation accuracyVSAvoidchip region estate
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSArea of stationary object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent extracts test pattern formation from chip regions and relocates it to scribe line regions. This separation allows electrical issue evaluation to be performed without occupying valuable chip region estate, directly resolving the contradiction between reliability testing and area utilization.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent segments the wafer into distinct functional regions: chip regions for product fabrication and scribe line regions for testing. This segmentation enables independent optimization of both areas, allowing comprehensive electrical testing without compromising chip region capacity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

2Reliability

If test patterns are formed in chip regions of wafer, then electrical issues can be evaluated, but it takes a long time from pattern design to completion of CP test

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveelectrical issue evaluation accuracyVSAvoiddevelopment process time
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements preliminary action by forming test patterns in scribe line regions concurrently with front layer fabrication, rather than waiting for complete chip fabrication. This parallel processing significantly reduces the time from pattern design to electrical issue evaluation while maintaining testing accuracy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

3Reliability

If test keys or TEGs are disposed in scribe line region for checking defects, then manufacturing defects can be monitored, but they include a single type of test pattern which might not be indicative for other types of patterns in chip regions

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemanufacturing defect monitoringVSAvoidpattern type coverage
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies universality by designing test patterns in scribe line regions that can evaluate multiple pattern types and lithography conditions simultaneously. The test structures include various geometries (lines, spaces, contacts, vias) that represent different chip region patterns, enabling comprehensive evaluation of manufacturing processes across all pattern types through a single test location.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Data Source

PatentUS20250006562A1Method for optimizing layout pattern and semiconductor wafer
Publication Date: 2025.01.02 WINBOND ELECTRONICS CORP
  • US20250006562A1 patent drawing
  • US20250006562A1 patent drawing
  • US20250006562A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A layout optimization method and a semiconductor wafer are provided. The method includes: generating adjusted patterns corresponding to a first layout pattern; generating a layout optimization test group according to the adjusted patterns, wherein the layout optimization test group includes first and second clusters of test pattern arrays, the first cluster include first test pattern arrays in accordance with one of the adjusted patterns and different from one another in terms of capacity, and the second cluster include second test pattern arrays in accordance with another one of the adjusted patterns and different from one another in terms of capacity; forming the layout optimization test group on a wafer; performing an electrical inspection on the first and second pattern arrays, and determining a best manufacturing solution from the adjusted patterns according to the electrical inspection.