SD-WAN Route Distribution Using Transport Compatibility Filtering

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

SD-WAN controllers indiscriminately distribute routes that are often not compatible with the configurations of edge network devices, leading to unusable paths and scalability issues due to the need to send a high number of non-viable paths to ensure viable paths are received, which increases computational load and stability problems.

Innovation Solution

The SD-WAN controller uses a transport compatibility matrix and heuristics to determine compatible routes based on tunnel-group-IDs, transport colors, and color-restrict settings, intelligently selecting routes for distribution that account for route viability conditions, reducing the need for a high send-path-limit and minimizing non-viable paths.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If the SD-WAN controller distributes a high number of routes to ensure viable paths are received, then the likelihood of receiving viable paths improves, but the computational load and memory usage increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveroute viabilityVSAvoidcomputational load
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The SD-WAN controller performs preliminary filtering of routes based on transport compatibility criteria (transport colors, tunnel-group-IDs, color-restrict settings) before distributing routes to edge network devices. This preliminary action ensures that only potentially viable routes are distributed, eliminating the need to distribute excessive routes and reducing computational load while maintaining reliability

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Reliability

If the SD-WAN controller distributes a high number of routes to ensure viable paths are received, then the likelihood of receiving viable paths improves, but the scalability deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveroute viabilityVSAvoidscalability
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The controller pre-evaluates route compatibility using transport compatibility criteria before distribution, enabling scalable operation by reducing the route set to only those likely to be viable, thus maintaining reliability while improving scalability

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

3Ease of operation

If the SD-WAN controller distributes routes without filtering, then the distribution process is simple, but many non-viable paths are distributed causing stability problems

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveroute distribution simplicityVSAvoidnetwork stability
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The controller applies transport compatibility filtering (based on transport colors, tunnel-group-IDs, and color-restrict settings) as a preliminary step before route distribution. This maintains operational simplicity while significantly improving network stability by preventing distribution of non-viable paths

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Data Source

PatentUS20260058901A1Intelligent route selection and distribution in sd-wan routing controllers based on peer's transport characteristics
Publication Date: 2026.02.26 CISCO TECHNOLOGY INC
  • US20260058901A1 patent drawing
  • US20260058901A1 patent drawing
  • US20260058901A1 patent drawing

AI summary

The present technology intelligently selects routes to be distributed to edge network device from SD-WAN controllers. Rather than indiscriminately distributing routes, the present technology utilizes logic to account for route viability conditions to determine whether a route between a first edge network device and a second edge network device is likely to be usable between the edge network devices.