SDD Analysis for Lab Analyzer Calibration

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current laboratory analyzers often fail to detect intermittent errors due to infrequent quality control analyses, leading to unnecessary medical procedures and diagnostic inaccuracies, as existing methods are either costly or cumbersome and do not effectively differentiate between analytical and biologic variations.

Innovation Solution

Implementing a Standard Deviation of Deltas (SDD) analysis method that calculates the average variation of repeated patient measurements over time to detect analytical shifts and errors, allowing for more precise calibration and reducing unnecessary testing.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If quality control analyses are performed frequently to detect analytical errors, then diagnostic accuracy is improved, but cost and operational complexity increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvediagnostic accuracyVSAvoidoperational complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary SDD analysis on historical patient measurement data to establish baseline analytical variation and detect drift trends before they significantly impact diagnostic accuracy. This proactive approach allows for scheduled calibration at optimal intervals rather than requiring frequent ad-hoc quality control analyses, reducing operational complexity while maintaining diagnostic precision.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system continuously monitors analytical variation through SDD calculations and provides feedback on drift trends to guide calibration decisions. This feedback mechanism enables dynamic adjustment of calibration schedules based on actual analyzer performance, avoiding both over-calibration (wasting resources) and under-calibration (compromising accuracy), thus resolving the contradiction between diagnostic accuracy and operational complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Reliability

If quality control analyses are performed frequently to detect analytical errors, then reliability of test results is improved, but cost increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvereliability of test resultsVSAvoidcost
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of energy

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary SDD analysis on historical data to predict when analytical drift will reach clinically significant levels. This allows scheduling calibration at optimal intervals that maintain result reliability without performing unnecessary quality control analyses in between, thereby reducing the cost of quality assurance while preserving reliability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system dynamically adjusts the calibration interval parameter based on calculated SDD values and drift trends. When analytical variation is low and stable, calibration intervals are extended to reduce cost. When drift accelerates or SDD increases, the system triggers earlier calibration to maintain reliability. This adaptive parameter adjustment resolves the contradiction between reliability and cost.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Measurement precision

If repeated patient measurements are analyzed to detect analytical shifts, then measurement precision is improved, but loss of time in data processing increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedetection of analytical shiftsVSAvoiddata processing time
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system extracts only the essential information needed for SDD calculation from patient measurement data—specifically, paired measurements taken at similar physiological states—while discarding redundant information. This selective extraction approach maintains the precision of analytical shift detection by focusing on relevant data pairs while significantly reducing the overall data processing time through efficient filtering and exclusion of unnecessary measurements.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Data Source

PatentUS10943675B2Altering patient care based on long term SDD
Publication Date: 2021.03.09 CEMBROWSKI GEORGE S
  • US10943675B2 patent drawing
  • US10943675B2 patent drawing
  • US10943675B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Generally discussed herein are systems, apparatuses, and methods that relate to altering patient care and increasing the efficacy of medical diagnostics. A standard deviation of deltas (SDD) plot of analyte measurements can provide insights into the medical diagnostics. One or more SDD plots can be used to help diagnose a patient and alter a patient's care depending on the relation of the patient's own SDD plot characteristics relative to the one or more SDD plots. Any or all of the analysis can be automated, such as to reduce human interaction with process.