SDDC Application Upgrade via Appliance State Replication

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

In software-defined data centers (SDDCs), existing methods for upgrading applications often result in significant downtime, which is undesirable, especially for applications requiring frequent upgrades, and there is a need for a method to revert to a stable state in case of upgrade failures.

Innovation Solution

A method involving lifecycle management software that deploys a second appliance with an upgraded version of services, replicates the state of the first appliance, performs a switchover to activate the new appliance, and contracts the unused state of the second appliance, allowing for minimal downtime and easy rollback.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If traditional upgrade methods are used, then application services can be upgraded to new versions, but significant downtime is caused which affects service availability

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveservice availabilityVSAvoidupgrade downtime
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The upgrade process is segmented into multiple appliances (first appliance for current version, second appliance for new version) that operate independently. This allows the new version to be prepared and tested without disrupting the running services, enabling zero-downtime upgrades by switching between segmented components rather than upgrading in-place.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The second appliance is deployed and configured in advance with the new version services before the actual upgrade occurs. The state of the first appliance is replicated to the second appliance beforehand, so when switchover is needed, the new version is already ready to take over immediately without requiring downtime for preparation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Adaptability or versatility

If applications are upgraded frequently to maintain compliance, then policy compliance is improved, but downtime accumulates which reduces productivity

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecompliance with company policiesVSAvoidapplication service continuity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

Appliance states are replicated in advance to prepare the new version appliance before upgrade time. This preliminary state replication ensures that when compliance upgrades are needed, the system can switch appliances instantly without time-consuming preparation, allowing frequent compliance updates without productivity loss.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The state of the first appliance is copied to the second appliance, creating a complete replica of the current version. This copying mechanism enables the new version to be tested and validated against compliance policies while the old version continues serving, allowing frequent compliance checks and updates without service disruption.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

3Reliability

If upgrade processes include rollback capability, then reliability is improved, but system complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improverollback capabilityVSAvoidupgrade process complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system maintains separate first and second appliances for current and new versions respectively, with the ability to switch between them. This segmentation provides inherent rollback capability by simply switching back to the first appliance, avoiding the need for complex rollback mechanisms while maintaining reliability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The second appliance is prepared in advance with the new version, and the replication process creates a complete state copy. If the upgrade fails or needs to be rolled back, the system can simply switch back to the first appliance's state, providing easy rollback without complex procedures since the previous state is already preserved.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Data Source

PatentUS11900099B2Reduced downtime during upgrade of an application hosted in a data center
Publication Date: 2024.02.13 VMWARE INC
  • US11900099B2 patent drawing
  • US11900099B2 patent drawing
  • US11900099B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A method of upgrading an application in a software-defined data center (SDDC) includes: deploying, by lifecycle management software executing in the SDDC, a second appliance, a first appliance executing services of the application at a first version, the second appliance having services of the application at a second version, the services in the first appliance being active and the services in the second appliance being inactive; expanding, by the lifecycle management software, state of the first appliance to support both the services at the first version and the services at the second version; replicating, by the lifecycle management software, the state of the first appliance to the second appliance; performing, by the lifecycle management software, a switchover to stop the services of the first appliance and start the services of the second appliance; and contracting, by the lifecycle management software, state of the second appliance to remove a portion unused by the services at the second version.