SDMA User Cooperation for Beam-Forming Feedback Reduction

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current SDMA communication systems face challenges in effectively performing beam-forming due to excessive feedback information requirements, which consume radio resources and are prone to errors caused by fading and noise, necessitating a reduction in feedback data without compromising performance.

Innovation Solution

The system employs user cooperation by selecting an active member terminal within a group to transmit reduced selection information to the base station, allowing for effective beam-forming using a head node that receives and processes channel information from member terminals, thereby minimizing feedback errors and resource consumption.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If the amount of feedback information is increased to improve beam-forming performance, then the beam-forming performance is improved, but radio resources are excessively consumed

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvebeam-forming performanceVSAvoidradio resource consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of energy

Solution Approach 1:

The patent extracts only the essential feedback information needed for beam-forming by selecting a subset of channel state information parameters. Instead of transmitting complete channel matrices, the system transmits only the most critical components (e.g., dominant eigenvectors or selected channel coefficients), thereby maintaining beam-forming performance while reducing radio resource consumption.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent applies local quality by transmitting feedback information with different precision levels for different parts of the channel state. Critical spatial parameters are transmitted with high precision, while less critical temporal or frequency parameters are transmitted with lower precision or omitted entirely, optimizing the trade-off between performance and resource usage.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

2Reliability

If the amount of feedback information is increased to improve beam-forming performance, then the beam-forming performance is improved, but feedback errors increase due to fading and noise

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvebeam-forming performanceVSAvoidfeedback information errors
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of information

Solution Approach 1:

The patent extracts only the most robust and essential feedback parameters that are least susceptible to fading and noise. By selecting only the dominant spatial characteristics of the channel, the system minimizes the amount of information transmitted over the vulnerable feedback link, thereby reducing the impact of fading and noise on feedback accuracy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent performs preliminary processing at the user equipment to pre-process channel state information before transmission. This includes channel estimation, singular value decomposition, and selection of dominant components, which are performed locally before the feedback link. This preliminary action reduces the sensitivity of feedback information to channel fading and noise.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

3Reliability

If complete channel state information is transmitted by each user terminal, then the base station can perform optimal beam-forming, but the complexity of the feedback system increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvebeam-forming accuracyVSAvoidfeedback system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent extracts only the essential components of channel state information needed for beam-forming. Instead of transmitting complete channel matrices, the system transmits reduced representations such as dominant eigenvectors, selected channel coefficients, or compressed channel state indicators, thereby maintaining beam-forming accuracy while significantly reducing feedback system complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent merges the feedback processing functions of multiple user terminals through a centralized selection mechanism. A base station or coordinating entity selects and combines feedback information from multiple users, creating a unified feedback representation that reduces overall system complexity while maintaining the ability to perform multi-user beam-forming.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Data Source

PatentUS8010140B2Method of space division multiple access communication using user cooperation and system of enabling the method
Publication Date: 2011.08.30 SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO LTD
  • US8010140B2 patent drawing
  • US8010140B2 patent drawing
  • US8010140B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A communication device using user cooperation is provided with a channel information reception unit to receive channel information from a plurality of member terminals within the same group, the channel information being associated with a radio channel formed between the plurality of member terminals and a base station; a member terminal selection unit to select at least one active member terminal from among the plurality of member terminals based on the channel information; and a selection information transmission unit to transmit selection information to the base station, the selection information being associated with a radio channel formed between the at least one active member terminal and the base station.