Partial SDN Switch Replacement for IP Network Failure Recovery

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Traditional IP networks face challenges in achieving comprehensive and efficient failure recovery and load balancing due to the complexity and disruptive nature of existing methods, which often result in suboptimal solutions and increased congestion.

Innovation Solution

Partial integration of SDN-OF enabled devices into traditional IP networks, replacing a limited number of IP nodes with SDN switches to create a hybrid network that enables ultra-fast failure recovery and load balancing, utilizing an external controller for centralized routing decisions and flow table management.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If traditional IP networks use sophisticated failure recovery methods to provide sufficient coverage, then network reliability is improved, but device complexity and operational disruption increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefailure recovery coverageVSAvoidrecovery method complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the network into SDN-controlled segments and traditional IP segments. The SDN controller handles complex failure recovery decisions for specific network portions, while traditional IP devices continue standard operations. This segmentation allows sophisticated recovery coverage without requiring all devices to implement complex recovery logic, thus improving reliability while managing device complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The SDN controller acts as an intermediary between network devices and failure recovery operations. It receives status information from traditional IP devices, computes optimal recovery paths, and installs flow rules to redirect traffic. This intermediary approach centralizes complex recovery logic, providing sufficient failure coverage without increasing complexity at individual device levels.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Reliability

If traditional IP networks implement comprehensive failure recovery methods, then network reliability is improved, but convergence time to stand-by resources increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefailure recovery coverageVSAvoidconvergence time
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary actions by pre-computing alternate paths and pre-installing flow rules in SDN switches before failures occur. When a failure is detected, traffic is immediately redirected using pre-prepared recovery paths, significantly reducing convergence time compared to traditional methods that calculate routes after failure detection.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The SDN controller implements continuous feedback monitoring of network device status and link health. This real-time feedback enables the controller to detect failures immediately and trigger pre-computed recovery actions without waiting for traditional distributed protocols to converge, thereby reducing convergence time while maintaining comprehensive recovery coverage.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Device complexity

If traditional IP networks use distributed recovery methods, then device complexity is reduced, but network congestion increases due to locally optimal solutions

Engineering Contradiction:
Improverecovery method simplicityVSAvoidnetwork congestion control
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The SDN controller serves as a centralized intermediary that receives status information from simple traditional IP devices, computes globally optimal recovery paths considering overall network state, and distributes flow rules back to devices. This approach maintains simplicity at device level while preventing congestion through centralized, coordinated recovery decisions that avoid the locally optimal but globally suboptimal outcomes of purely distributed methods.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

4Speed

If SDN switches replace IP nodes in hybrid networks, then failure recovery speed is improved, but device complexity and deployment cost increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefailure recovery speedVSAvoidnetwork infrastructure complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
SpeedVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies partial action by replacing only a limited number of strategic IP nodes with SDN switches rather than converting the entire network. These partial SDN deployments provide ultra-fast recovery capabilities at critical points while leaving the majority of the network as traditional IP infrastructure, thus achieving speed improvement without proportionally increasing overall device complexity and deployment cost.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Data Source

PatentEP3661127B1Partial software defined network switch replacement in IP networks
Publication Date: 2024.08.28 HUAWEI TECH CO LTD
  • EP3661127B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP3661127B1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP3661127B1 patent drawingFigure 3

AI summary

The claimed subject matter is directed to novel methods and systems for a network topology wherein an IP network is partially integrated and enhanced with a relatively small number of SDN-OF enabled network devices to provide a resilient network that is able to quickly recover from a network failure and achieves post-recovery load balancing while minimizing cost and complexity. By combining SDN-OF enabled switches with traditional IP nodes such as routers, a novel network architecture and methods are described herein that allows for ultra-fast and load balancing-aware failure recovery of the data network.