Runtime Service Discovery in Software-Defined Vehicle Architectures

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing software-defined vehicle (SDV) architectures face challenges in managing dynamic service communication across different hardware components due to static interface management, leading to inflexibility and fragmentation.

Innovation Solution

Implementing a centralized registry and service discovery module that allows for dynamic interface management by registering service units and enabling runtime interface enforcement, allowing different implementations of unit types to be discovered and integrated dynamically.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If static interface management is used, then system stability is maintained, but adaptability and flexibility are reduced

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveadaptabilityVSAvoidstability
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSStability of the object's composition

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements dynamic interface management by allowing service units to register and discover interfaces at runtime rather than using static compile-time definitions. The service discovery module enables dynamic resolution of unit types, allowing the system to adapt to changing service implementations while maintaining stable interface contracts through centralized registration and discovery mechanisms.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Adaptability or versatility

If static interface management is used, then implementation simplicity is maintained, but service communication flexibility is reduced

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveservice communication flexibilityVSAvoidcomplexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent introduces a service discovery module as an intermediary component that mediates between service units and unit type declarations. This centralized registry acts as a mediator that handles interface resolution, allowing service units to communicate flexibly without requiring complex direct coupling between components, thus reducing overall system complexity while enabling flexible service communication.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

3Adaptability or versatility

If runtime interface enforcement is implemented, then adaptability is improved, but processing time increases

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveadaptabilityVSAvoidprocessing time
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies preliminary action by having service units register their interface implementations in advance with the service discovery module. Unit types are pre-declared and registered, so when services need to communicate, the interface resolution can be performed quickly through lookup in the pre-organized registry rather than performing complex analysis at runtime, thus reducing processing time while maintaining adaptability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Data Source

PatentUS20250362930A1Cohesive framework of runtime characterization of dynamic services in software-defined vehicle architectures
Publication Date: 2025.11.27 GOOGLE LLC
  • US20250362930A1 patent drawing
  • US20250362930A1 patent drawing
  • US20250362930A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A software defined vehicle (SDV) operating system may include components for executing software packages that declare unit types (e.g., interfaces) and define service units that each implement a unit type. For each unit type, there may be several service units that each provide a different implementation of that unit type. The SDV operating system may manage a service discovery module that registers service units for each unit type in a centralized registry. While executing a software package that declares a unit type, the service discovery module may fetch, from the centralized registry, an implementation of the unit type by a service unit defined by a different software package. While still executing the software package (i.e., at runtime), the SDV operating system may load a service unit defined by the software package with the fetched implementation. The SDV operating system may then execute the service unit based on the fetched implementation.