SDWAN Controller for Selective IPv4-to-IPv6 Node Migration

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

The challenge of migrating nodes from IPv4 to IPv6 is hindered by significant software and hardware designed for IPv4, leading to potential malfunction or failure of nodes during the transition due to incompatibilities.

Innovation Solution

A network controller, such as a SDWAN controller, identifies nodes and their features, uses a compatibility matrix to differentiate between compatible and incompatible features, and facilitates selective migration by generating configurations for nodes to transition to IPv6, while avoiding disruption by excluding essential features.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If nodes are migrated from IPv4 to IPv6, then the network gains access to a larger address space and improved routing capabilities, but nodes may malfunction or stop functioning due to incompatibility with IPv4-specific features

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveaddress space capacityVSAvoidnode functionality
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary identification of IPv6-incompatible features in nodes before migration. A controller discovers nodes, identifies their features, and determines compatibility with IPv6 in advance, allowing planners to assess migration risks and prepare appropriate configurations before actual migration occurs.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system introduces an intermediary controller that mediates the migration process. This controller generates migration configurations, manages the transition, and ensures that nodes are properly prepared for IPv6 while maintaining network functionality. The intermediary coordinates the migration to prevent node malfunction.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Productivity

If a comprehensive migration to IPv6 is performed, then the entire network benefits from improved capabilities, but essential IPv4-specific features may be disrupted or lost

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvenetwork capabilityVSAvoidfeature disruption
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSObject-generated harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The system applies local quality by allowing different nodes to have different migration configurations based on their specific feature compatibility. Each node is assessed individually, and migration configurations are customized to preserve essential features while enabling IPv6 functionality where compatible. This selective approach ensures that critical features are not disrupted while still achieving network-wide IPv6 adoption.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes parameters by generating specific migration configurations that adjust node settings to be compatible with IPv6 while preserving essential features. The controller modifies network parameters and node configurations to enable smooth transition, transforming the network state from IPv4-only to IPv6-capable without causing harmful disruptions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Measurement precision

If manual assessment of each node's feature compatibility is performed, then migration accuracy is improved, but the migration process becomes time-consuming and complex

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecompatibility assessment accuracyVSAvoidmigration duration
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system implements self-service by enabling nodes to automatically report their features to the controller. Instead of requiring manual assessment, nodes autonomously provide information about their capabilities and configurations. The controller then automatically determines compatibility and generates appropriate migration configurations, eliminating time-consuming manual processes while maintaining high assessment accuracy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The system uses feedback mechanisms where nodes report their feature status to the controller, which then uses this information to determine compatibility and generate migration configurations. This automated feedback loop enables precise compatibility assessment without manual intervention, significantly reducing migration time while maintaining high accuracy in identifying suitable nodes for IPv6 migration.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Data Source

PatentUS12368637B2Coordinated migration of a network to a communication protocol
Publication Date: 2025.07.22 CISCO TECHNOLOGY INC
  • US12368637B2 patent drawing
  • US12368637B2 patent drawing
  • US12368637B2 patent drawing

AI summary

This disclosure describes techniques for migrating nodes from a first communication protocol to a second communication protocol. An example method is performed by a software-defined wide area network (SDWAN) controller. The example method includes identifying nodes in a network; identifying features associated with the nodes; identifying Internet Protocol version 6 (IPv6)-incompatible features among the features; and outputting, to a user, a list of the IPv6-incompatible features. The example method further includes receiving, from the user, a selection of nonessential features including at least one of the IPv6-incompatible features; identifying at least one of the nodes corresponding to the selection; and causing migration of the at least one of the nodes to IPv6.