Sealed Computing Device Opinion Polling for Anonymous, Auditable Results

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Traditional opinion polling and election systems suffer from inaccuracies due to reliance on small sample sizes, lack of anonymity, susceptibility to misuse, and difficulty in auditing, leading to varying levels of public trust and unreliable results.

Innovation Solution

A system and method using network-connected computing devices for conducting Reliable Opinion Polls that authenticate participants, anonymize responses, and provide real-time auditability, ensuring that responses are verified and tallied correctly, allowing for secure and reliable collection of opinions from large populations.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of manufacture

If traditional sample-style opinion polling is used, then cost and practical feasibility are improved, but measurement precision and reliability deteriorate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecost and practical feasibilityVSAvoidaccuracy of poll results
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the population into distinct groups (e.g., registered voters, voters by mail, in-person voters) and analyzes each segment separately rather than using a single homogeneous sample. This allows for more precise measurement of different voter demographics while maintaining manageable data collection processes for each segment.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent transitions from traditional two-dimensional sampling (geographic or demographic stratification) to a multi-dimensional approach that incorporates multiple data types including geographic location, demographic characteristics, voting history, and response patterns. This dimensional expansion enables more accurate prediction of election outcomes while remaining feasible through automated data processing.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

2Ease of operation

If normalization of survey populations is used, then ease of operation is improved, but measurement precision deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesurvey administrationVSAvoidaccuracy of poll results
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies local quality by analyzing different population segments with their specific characteristics rather than applying a uniform normalization approach. Each geographic region, demographic group, or voting method is examined for its unique patterns and weighted accordingly, preserving local nuances that would be lost in overall normalization while maintaining systematic analysis procedures.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

3Device complexity

If small sample sizes are used, then device complexity and resources required are reduced, but reliability deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepolling system complexityVSAvoidreliability of election prediction
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements self-service through automated data collection, processing, and analysis systems that continuously gather and process voter data without requiring manual intervention. The system automatically segments data, applies analytical algorithms, updates predictions in real-time, and generates reports, thereby maintaining high reliability with manageable system complexity through automation rather than manual processes.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

4Ease of operation

If traditional electronic voting systems are used, then ease of operation is improved, but reliability and security deteriorate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvevoting process simplicityVSAvoidsecurity and auditability of election
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent introduces an intermediary verification layer between the voting system and the results reporting. This intermediary component independently verifies vote validity, checks for duplicates, ensures proper authentication, and validates the tallying process before results are released. This mediator maintains ease of operation for voters while significantly improving security and auditability through transparent verification mechanisms.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Data Source

PatentUS20250246038A1System and method for reliable opinion polls for elections
Publication Date: 2025.07.31 SMITH DAVID LANE
  • US20250246038A1 patent drawing
  • US20250246038A1 patent drawing
  • US20250246038A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A system and method of reliable polling using sealed computing devices for the purpose of conducting an election.