Sealed Fluid Connector Geometry for Fast Brake System Assembly

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing methods for sealed connections between components require time-consuming and costly machining processes, alignment adjustments, and are prone to damage during assembly, particularly for fluid transfer in brake systems.

Innovation Solution

A connecting device with a pipe portion and a sealing element featuring inflow and outflow regions that extend beyond the pipe ends, allowing fluid flow transverse to the pipe's extent, and a mirror-symmetrical design with positioning projections and recesses for easy alignment and secure fixation, ensuring a sealed connection.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If traditional groove machining and O-ring insertion methods are used for sealed connection, then sealing function is achieved, but manufacturing time and cost increase significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesealing functionVSAvoidmanufacturing time
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The invention extracts the sealing function from the traditional groove-O-ring assembly and integrates it directly into the pipe end geometry. The sealing element is built into the pipe end structure itself, eliminating the need for separate groove machining and O-ring installation steps, thus reducing manufacturing time while maintaining sealing reliability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The invention merges the sealing function with the pipe end structure by integrating the sealing element directly into the pipe end geometry. This consolidation eliminates separate components and assembly steps, reducing both manufacturing complexity and time while ensuring reliable sealing through the integrated design.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

2Reliability

If groove machining is performed for sealing element installation, then sealing connection is achieved, but manufacturing cost increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesealing connectionVSAvoidmanufacturing cost
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The invention extracts the sealing function from expensive groove machining operations and implements it through the integrated pipe end geometry. This eliminates the need for precision groove machining and separate O-ring installation, significantly reducing manufacturing costs while maintaining reliable sealing connection through the built-in sealing element design.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The invention merges the sealing function with the pipe end structure, eliminating the need for separate groove machining operations. This integration reduces manufacturing steps and costs while ensuring reliable sealing through the consolidated design that combines structural and sealing functions in one element.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

3Ease of operation

If additional sleeve or pin is introduced for alignment, then component alignment is achieved, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovealignmentVSAvoidalignment components
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The invention extracts the alignment function from separate sleeves or pins and integrates it directly into the pipe end geometry. The built-in sealing element and pipe end structure provide inherent alignment features that guide component assembly without requiring additional alignment components, thus reducing device complexity while maintaining ease of alignment during assembly.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

4Reliability

If traditional connection methods are used, then sealed connection is achieved, but risk of O-ring damage during assembly increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesealed connectionVSAvoidO-ring damage risk
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The invention extracts the sealing element from the traditional O-ring component and integrates it directly into the pipe end structure. This eliminates the O-ring as a separate installable component, removing the risk of O-ring damage during assembly while maintaining reliable sealed connection through the integrated sealing element that is part of the pipe end geometry itself.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Data Source

PatentUS12379053B2Connecting device for a sealed exchange of fluid between two components, connecting system and brake system
Publication Date: 2025.08.05 ZF ACTIVE SAFETY GMBH
  • US12379053B2 patent drawing
  • US12379053B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A connecting device for a sealed exchange of fluid between two components is disclosed. The connecting devices comprises a pipe portion with at least two pipe portion ends, wherein an extent of the pipe portion between the pipe portion ends determines a streamline of the fluid, and comprises a sealing element which at least partially surrounds the pipe portion. At least one of the pipe portion ends is configured to form an inflow and/or outflow region that extends over the clear dimension of the at least one pipe portion end.