Sealed Multi-Channel Fluid Processing for Contamination-Free Sample Prep

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional fluid processing techniques and devices are prone to human error, equipment error, cross contamination, and environmental contamination, leading to imprecise or inaccurate results and inconsistent sample preparations. These methods are also time-consuming and expensive.

Innovation Solution

A fluid processing device comprising two or more fluid channels and multiple processing stations, each equipped with pump assemblies and reagent input systems, allowing for simultaneous and identical processing of multiple fluid samples. This device is designed to minimize human intervention and reduce the risk of contamination by sealing the fluid processing within a consumable cassette.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If conventional fluid processing techniques are used, then equipment complexity and cost increase, but processing precision and consistency deteriorate due to human error and equipment variability

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprocessing precisionVSAvoidequipment complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent combines multiple separate fluid processing functions (pumping, mixing, incubation, separation) into a single integrated microfluidic device. Multiple fluid channels are merged into one device with shared control mechanisms, eliminating the need for multiple separate pieces of equipment and reducing human intervention points that cause errors.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The microfluidic device incorporates automated control systems that self-regulate fluid flow, mixing ratios, and processing timing without human intervention. The device autonomously performs multi-step processing sequences, eliminating human error and equipment variability while maintaining high precision.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

2Productivity

If conventional fluid processing equipment is used, then processing capability is adequate, but processing time increases due to manual operations and sequential processing

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprocessing speedVSAvoidprocessing time
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The microfluidic device enables continuous fluid processing through integrated channels that allow simultaneous multi-step operations. Fluid samples undergo multiple processing steps (mixing, incubation, separation) in continuous flow without stopping or manual transfer, dramatically reducing processing time while maintaining adequate processing capability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #20Continuity of useful action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent transitions from sequential processing in separate equipment to parallel processing across multiple fluid channels within a single device. Multiple samples can be processed simultaneously through different channels, and multiple steps occur concurrently through the integrated design, increasing productivity without sacrificing processing capability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

3Reliability

If manual fluid processing is performed, then equipment cost is reduced, but contamination risk increases due to human intervention and environmental exposure

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecontamination resistanceVSAvoiddevice simplicity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The microfluidic device uses sealed microchannels and closed-system architecture that prevent environmental contamination. The integrated design incorporates sealed connections between all fluid handling components, eliminating open transfer points where contamination could occur, while maintaining relatively simple manufacturing through standard microfabrication techniques.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #30Flexible shells and thin films

4Reliability

If multiple separate processing stations are used, then processing versatility is adequate, but cross-contamination risk increases between samples

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesample integrityVSAvoidprocessing versatility
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The microfluidic device incorporates physically separated fluid channels for different samples, with each channel completely isolated from others. This segmentation prevents cross-contamination between samples while maintaining the ability to process multiple sample types and perform various fluid processing functions within each isolated channel, preserving processing versatility.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Data Source

PatentEP3976257B1Fluid processing device and method
Publication Date: 2025.04.09 LOST ARROW BIO
  • EP3976257B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP3976257B1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP3976257B1 patent drawingFigure 3

AI summary

A fluid processing device comprises multiple separate fluid channels and multiple processing stations configured to perform identical and simultaneous process steps on multiple fluid samples in the fluid channels. An embodiment of the fluid processing device is contained in a compact, low-cost, sealed consumable with sample input wells, reagent input wells, and sample output wells.