Sample Tube Sealing Cap with Segmented Cavity to Limit Liquid Transfer

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing sealing caps for blood collection tubes allow a significant amount of liquid to flow into the sample tube during centrifugation, contaminating the sample and potentially falsifying analysis results due to coagulation and hemolysis, and also risk contamination during transport.

Innovation Solution

The cavity of the sealing cap is divided into two sub-areas, with only the smaller sub-area above the opening allowing liquid to flow into the sample tube, reducing the volume of liquid that enters the sample tube and maintaining the desired ratio of liquid to preparation.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Quantity of substance

If the cavity of the sealing cap is designed with a larger volume to accommodate more liquid, then the sampling capacity is improved, but during centrifugation a larger amount of liquid flows into the sample tube causing contamination and falsifying analysis results

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesampling capacityVSAvoidsample contamination
Core Design Contradiction:
Quantity of substanceVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The cavity is divided into two separate sub-areas (first sub-area and second sub-area) by a separating wall. The first sub-area stores the majority of the liquid sample, while the second sub-area positioned above the opening contains only a small residual amount of liquid. This segmentation prevents excessive liquid from entering the sample tube during centrifugation, thus avoiding contamination while maintaining adequate sampling capacity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

2Reliability

If the non-return valve is designed to remain closed during transport, then sample contamination is prevented, but during centrifugation the valve opens allowing liquid to flow into the sample tube

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesealing integrityVSAvoidliquid flow into sample tube
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSObject-generated harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The cavity design creates a local quality difference between the first sub-area (larger volume, below opening level) and the second sub-area (smaller volume, above opening level). This spatial differentiation ensures that even when the non-return valve opens during centrifugation, only the minimal liquid in the second sub-area can enter the sample tube, while the majority of liquid remains in the first sub-area and does not contaminate the sample.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

3Object-affected harmful factors

If the cavity volume is reduced to minimize liquid flow during centrifugation, then sample contamination is reduced, but the sampling capacity is diminished

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesample contaminationVSAvoidsampling capacity
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-affected harmful factorsVSQuantity of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The solution addresses the volume contradiction by introducing a spatial dimension - the separating wall creates vertical stratification of the cavity space. The first sub-area utilizes the lower volume space for bulk liquid storage, while the second sub-area occupies the upper space above the opening level. This dimensional arrangement allows the cavity to maintain large total volume for sampling capacity while ensuring minimal liquid (only in the second sub-area) can potentially contaminate the sample during centrifugation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This design minimizes the volume of liquid entering the sample tube, ensuring accurate analysis results by maintaining the integrity of the sample and preventing contamination, thus ensuring the quality of subsequent analysis.

Implementation Method 1

Due to the typical preparation of a sample in a centrifuge, a tensile force is exerted in the axial direction on the installed non-return valve, causing it to open. The relatively large amount of liquid contained in the cavity of the sealing cap enters the sample tube

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectCentrifugal force: Centrifugal Force

Data Source

PatentUS12383176B2Sealing cap for sealing a sample tube for receiving a liquid
Publication Date: 2025.08.12 SARSTEDT AG & CO KG
  • US12383176B2 patent drawing
  • US12383176B2 patent drawing
  • US12383176B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A sealing cap seals a sample tube for receiving a liquid, in particular blood. The sealing cap includes a cavity delimited by a membrane and a base having an opening that can be sealed by a non-return valve. In order to reduce the volume of liquid which, during centrifugation of the sample tube sealed by the sealing cap, flows out of the sealing cap through the then open opening into the sample tube, the cavity of the sealing cap has a separating wall that divides the cavity into a first and a second sub-area. Only the second sub-area is above the opening, also meaning that only the volume of liquid in the second sub-area can flow into the sample tube.