Sear Return Delay Mechanism for Select Fire Rifle

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

The rapid return of the sear to its stop-fire position in firearms, particularly in select fire rifles with op rods having two sear notches, can cause premature engagement with the rearward sear notch, preventing successful semi-automatic firing and leading to undesirable wear between the sear tip and op rod.

Innovation Solution

A sear return delay mechanism that employs a movable mass and a cam plate system, where the sear must work against the movable mass to return to the stop-fire position, providing a controlled delay to avoid premature engagement with the rearward sear notch, and can include magnetic forces or biasing elements to enhance the delay mechanism.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If the sear returns quickly to the stop-fire position, then the firing cycle speed is improved, but the sear tip and op rod experience excessive wear and premature engagement with the rearward sear notch occurs

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefiring cycle speedVSAvoidwear resistance
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent introduces a periodic delay action in the sear return mechanism using a cam plate and movable mass. The cam plate rotates periodically during the firing cycle, and the movable mass is displaced during sear return, creating a controlled delay that prevents premature engagement while maintaining overall cycle efficiency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #19Periodic action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces an intermediary mechanism (cam plate and movable mass) between the sear and the stop-fire position. This intermediary system controls the sear's return motion, delaying its engagement with the stop-fire position to reduce wear and prevent premature engagement with the rearward sear notch.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Reliability

If the sear returns quickly to the stop-fire position, then the semi-automatic firing reliability is improved, but the sear engages the rearward sear notch prematurely preventing successful firing

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesemi-automatic firing reliabilityVSAvoidfiring cycle smoothness
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The cam plate and movable mass create a periodic delay action that timing the sear return to occur at the optimal moment in the firing cycle. This ensures the sear engages the stop-fire position at the correct time, preventing premature engagement with the rearward sear notch while maintaining smooth operation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #19Periodic action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes the temporal parameter of the sear return by introducing a controlled delay. The cam plate rotation and movable mass displacement modify the timing characteristics of the sear return, transforming it from an immediate action to a delayed action that occurs at the optimal moment in the firing cycle.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Reliability

If a sear return delay mechanism is added, then wear between sear tip and op rod is reduced, but the device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvewear resistanceVSAvoidtrigger assembly complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent merges the delay mechanism components (cam plate and movable mass) with the existing trigger assembly structure. The cam plate is integrated into the trigger housing and the movable mass is positioned within the existing sear return path, combining multiple functions into a unified assembly rather than adding separate independent components.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The cam plate serves multiple functions: it controls the timing of the sear return, transfers motion to the movable mass, and prevents premature engagement with the rearward sear notch. The movable mass both delays the sear return and provides a mechanical stop to control the timing, making each component multi-functional to minimize overall complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The sear return delay mechanism effectively prevents the sear from engaging the rearward sear notch too quickly, ensuring successful semi-automatic firing and reducing wear between the sear tip and op rod, thereby improving the functionality of select fire trigger assemblies in firearms.

Implementation Method 1

A sear return delay mechanism is provided that delays the return of the sear tip from a fire position to a stop-fire position

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectInertia: Inertia

Implementation Method 2

can include magnetic forces or biasing elements to enhance the delay mechanism

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectMagnetic forces: Magnetism

Implementation Method 3

can include magnetic forces or biasing elements to enhance the delay mechanism

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElastic force: Elasticity

Data Source

PatentUS10288373B1Firearm with sear return delay mechanism
Publication Date: 2019.05.14 OHIO ORDNANCE WORKS
  • US10288373B1 patent drawing
  • US10288373B1 patent drawing
  • US10288373B1 patent drawing

AI summary

A firearm includes a sear with a sear tip, the sear movable between a stop-fire position, wherein a discharge mechanism is held by the sear tip against movement that would result in firing of a round, and a fire position, wherein the discharge mechanism is released by the sear tip to permit movement of the discharge mechanism to fire a round. The firearm includes a sear return delay mechanism delaying the return of the sear tip to the stop-fire position from the fire position.