Intelligent Search System Customization via Reverse Analysis

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current search systems often fail to provide users with relevant results efficiently, leading to user dissatisfaction and low retention rates for businesses that rely on search functionalities, as they do not adequately adapt to individual user preferences or behaviors.

Innovation Solution

An intelligent search and interface customization system that processes user requests by analyzing user data from various sources to optimize search results, customize the user interface, and implement a 'reverse search' method to ensure relevance, thereby enhancing user experience and search efficiency.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If the system processes and analyzes user data from various sources to optimize search results, then search result relevance is improved, but system complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesearch result relevanceVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system divides the complex search optimization process into distinct modules: user data collection module, user preference analysis module, search result processing module, and reverse search module. Each module handles specific tasks independently, making the overall system more manageable and maintainable while achieving high search result relevance through coordinated operation of these segmented components.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces intermediate processing layers including user profile databases that store analyzed user preferences, and intermediary algorithms that bridge raw user data with search query processing. These intermediaries decouple the complexity of data analysis from the search execution, allowing the system to maintain high relevance without proportionally increasing operational complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Ease of operation

If the system customizes the user interface based on user preferences, then user satisfaction is improved, but processing time increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveuser satisfactionVSAvoidprocessing time
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs user preference analysis and interface customization decisions in advance, storing processed user profiles and preference data in databases before actual search operations occur. When users interact with the system, pre-computed user profiles enable rapid interface customization without adding significant processing time to the search operation itself.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent applies customization selectively rather than universally - the system identifies specific interface elements and search result presentations that should be customized based on individual user preferences, while leaving other system components unchanged. This localized approach to customization improves user satisfaction without requiring complete system reconfiguration for each user, thereby limiting processing time increases.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

3Measurement precision

If the system implements reverse search to verify result relevance, then search accuracy is improved, but computational resources increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesearch accuracyVSAvoidcomputational resources
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The reverse search functionality is implemented selectively rather than for all search queries. The system applies reverse search primarily to complex or ambiguous queries where additional verification provides the most value, while using simpler verification methods for straightforward searches. This partial application of reverse search maintains high search accuracy for critical cases while limiting overall computational resource consumption.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

4Productivity

If the system presents the most relevant search results first based on user preferences, then user retention is improved, but data processing requirements increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveuser retentionVSAvoiddata processing requirements
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSQuantity of substance

Solution Approach 1:

User preference data and search behavior patterns are collected and analyzed in advance, with processed user profiles stored in databases before search operations occur. This preliminary processing of user data enables the system to rapidly retrieve and apply pre-computed preference information during search operations, improving user retention through personalized results without proportionally increasing real-time data processing requirements.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Data Source

PatentUS9886523B2Intelligent search and service customization
Publication Date: 2018.02.06 PIPL LTD
  • US9886523B2 patent drawing
  • US9886523B2 patent drawing
  • US9886523B2 patent drawing

AI summary

An intelligent search and interface customization system including innovative methods of processing user requests and optimizing search results is disclosed.