Search Interface Empty State Suggestion System

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current search technologies face challenges in efficiently helping users find data objects due to the rapid creation of new data, which increases the burden on search systems, and users often struggle to recall objects through traditional search terms, especially in user-created content contexts where associations may involve contexts like project topics or people involved.

Innovation Solution

An improved search interface that provides suggested search terms in various categories, including an empty search state, using machine learning algorithms to refine suggestions based on user inputs, and utilizing contextual categories such as recent searches, people, and tags to aid users in finding relevant data objects.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If traditional search interfaces are used, then the search system structure remains simple, but users struggle to find data objects efficiently due to rapid data creation and inability to recall objects through traditional search terms

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesearch efficiencyVSAvoidsearch interface complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary actions by pre-computing and storing contextual categories (people, places, things, recent searches, tags) before the user needs to search. When a search is initiated, these pre-organized contextual data is immediately available to generate relevant suggestions, eliminating the need for real-time complex processing while improving search efficiency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The search interface is segmented into multiple contextual categories (people, places, things, recent searches, tags) rather than presenting a monolithic search results page. This segmentation organizes information in a way that matches human cognitive patterns, making it easier for users to find and recall objects without increasing overall system complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

2Measurement precision

If more contextual categories and machine learning algorithms are added to improve search suggestions, then the quality of search results improves, but the computational resources and processing time increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesearch result relevanceVSAvoidcomputational resource consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

Contextual data is pre-computed and stored in structured categories before user interaction. The machine learning models process and organize this data in advance, so when a search is needed, the system can quickly retrieve and present pre-processed contextual information without performing computationally intensive real-time analysis, thus reducing energy consumption while maintaining high result relevance.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system provides more contextual categories than a traditional single-search-bar interface (including people, places, things, recent searches, and tags), but not all categories are equally weighted or processed with the same computational intensity. The system applies partial processing to the most relevant categories based on user behavior patterns, optimizing the balance between result quality and computational resources.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

3Loss of time

If the search interface provides detailed contextual categories and suggestions before search input, then users can find objects faster with fewer interactions, but the interface becomes more complex and requires more processing

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesearch timeVSAvoidinterface structure complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of timeVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The interface is segmented into distinct contextual categories (people, places, things, recent searches, tags) that are visually organized and easily navigable. This segmentation reduces search time by presenting information in pre-organized groups that match user mental models, while the modular structure keeps the complexity manageable through clear visual hierarchy and consistent layout patterns.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The contextual category framework serves multiple functions simultaneously: it organizes search results, provides navigation shortcuts, displays metadata, and enables filtered searching. This multi-functionality reduces the need for separate interface elements, thereby reducing overall interface complexity while maintaining fast search performance.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Data Source

PatentUS12105764B2Empty search state
Publication Date: 2024.10.01 DROPBOX INC
  • US12105764B2 patent drawing
  • US12105764B2 patent drawing
  • US12105764B2 patent drawing

AI summary

The present technology provides an improved search interface that provides suggested search terms in a variety of categories. The suggested search terms are first presented in an “empty search state” i.e., before the user has entered any search terms. And the suggested search terms are repeatedly refined as the user provides inputs into the search interface until a number of search results are few enough that the interface provides search results. The present technology also provides improved search suggestions. In particular, the present technology utilizes predictive algorithms including machine learning algorithms to intelligently provide suggested search terms in the variety of categories.