Search Results Pruning System for Relevance Filtering

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Users face inefficiencies in search engines and online shopping due to high irrelevant search results, requiring multiple queries and increased latency, as there is no mechanism to exclude unwanted items or entities until search results are provided, leading to a poor user experience.

Innovation Solution

Implementing a search results pruning system that includes a processor-based filtering unit to receive user filtering requests, filter search results, and provide updated results, allowing users to exclude specific entities or keywords, reducing irrelevant content and improving search efficiency.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Quantity of substance

If search engines provide comprehensive search results without filtering mechanisms, then the quantity of search results is high, but the relevance quality deteriorates and users experience poor search quality

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvequantity of search resultsVSAvoidrelevance quality of search results
Core Design Contradiction:
Quantity of substanceVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary filtering actions by providing filter options to users before they submit their search queries. Users can pre-select categories or entities they want to exclude from search results, and the search engine applies these filters in advance when processing the query, thereby improving result relevance without requiring multiple sequential searches

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system extracts and removes unwanted categories or entities from search results based on user-specified filters. By allowing users to identify and exclude specific items or entities they are not interested in, the system separates relevant results from irrelevant ones, improving overall search quality while maintaining comprehensive coverage of desired content

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

2Reliability

If users perform multiple successive search operations to exclude unwanted items, then the relevance quality improves, but the time consumption and latency increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improverelevance quality of search resultsVSAvoidtime consumption for multiple search operations
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system allows users to configure filter preferences in advance before submitting search queries. By pre-selecting categories or entities to exclude, users avoid the need to perform multiple successive searches to filter out unwanted results, thereby reducing time consumption while maintaining high relevance quality in a single search operation

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system incorporates feedback mechanisms where user interactions with search results (such as marking items as unwanted) are used to automatically update and refine filter settings. This feedback loop enables the system to learn from user behavior and improve result relevance over time without requiring users to manually perform multiple search operations

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Device complexity

If search engines lack filtering mechanisms until results are provided, then the system complexity is low, but the ease of operation deteriorates as users cannot exclude unwanted items

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesystem complexityVSAvoidease of excluding unwanted items
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The system segments the search process into distinct components: filter configuration, query submission, and result display. By separating the filtering functionality into a distinct module that operates independently from the core search engine, the system maintains low overall complexity while providing users with easy-to-use filtering capabilities through a user-friendly interface

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system provides self-service filtering capabilities where users can independently configure their own filter settings based on their preferences. The filtering mechanism automatically applies user-defined criteria without requiring complex system configuration or administrator intervention, thereby improving ease of operation while maintaining system simplicity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Data Source

PatentUS20230114265A1Method and system for filtering content
Publication Date: 2023.04.13 YAHOO ASSETS LLC
  • US20230114265A1 patent drawing
  • US20230114265A1 patent drawing
  • US20230114265A1 patent drawing

AI summary

The present teaching relates to methods, systems, and programming for information retrieval. A search result associated with a search query is obtained and provided to a user. Upon receiving a filtering request from the user, the search result is filtered based on the filtering request to generate an updated search result. The updated search result is provided to the user in response to the filtering request.