Search Engine Quality Scoring via Machine Learning

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current search engines do not provide users with quality assessments or political lean evaluations of search results, leading to potential misinformation and biased content being presented as high-quality results.

Innovation Solution

A search engine system that utilizes machine learning techniques to generate quality scores and political lean assessments for each piece of content returned in search results, incorporating journalistic principles and domain expertise to evaluate the quality and bias of articles.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If search engines return results based on algorithmic parsing of query terms, then search results are generated efficiently, but the quality and political lean of the results cannot be assessed

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesearch result generation efficiencyVSAvoidquality and political lean assessment information
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSLoss of information

Solution Approach 1:

The search system segments the evaluation process into distinct components: a quality assessment module that evaluates journalistic principles (accuracy, fairness, independence) and a political lean assessment module that detects political bias. These separate modules process search results independently and provide distinct scores, allowing the system to maintain efficient search result generation while adding comprehensive quality and bias assessments without compromising the core search functionality.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

2Loss of energy

If sponsored advertisements are placed at the top of search results, then revenue is generated, but the most relevant results may not appear first

Engineering Contradiction:
Improverevenue generationVSAvoidrelevance of top results
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of energyVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The system applies different quality standards and assessment criteria to different types of search results. Sponsored advertisements are evaluated using advertising-specific criteria, while organic search results are evaluated using journalistic quality principles. This local differentiation allows the system to maintain revenue generation through sponsored content while ensuring that the most relevant and high-quality organic results are properly identified and can be surfaced appropriately.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

3Device complexity

If no quality check is performed on search results, then the system remains simple and fast, but users cannot assess the quality of stories and articles

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesystem simplicityVSAvoidquality of search results
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs quality and political lean assessments in advance, during the indexing and content analysis phase, rather than at query time. Search results are pre-evaluated and assigned quality scores and political lean indicators before being presented to users. This preliminary action allows the system to maintain simplicity and fast response times while providing comprehensive quality assessment information when needed.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Data Source

PatentUS12210535B1Search system and method having quality scoring
Publication Date: 2025.01.28 SEEKR TECHNOLOGIES INC
  • US12210535B1 patent drawing
  • US12210535B1 patent drawing
  • US12210535B1 patent drawing

AI summary

A search system and method generates a quality score and/or a political lean score for a piece of content and returns the one or more scores to the user when returning search results from a query to the user. In one embodiment, the system and method may use artificial intelligence/machine learning to determine the one or more scores for each piece of content.