Search Query Classification and Aggregation for Organized Results

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current search engines provide search results in an unorganized manner, leading to a cumbersome and unsatisfying user experience when searching for information online.

Innovation Solution

Implementing methods to automatically classify search queries into categories, execute searches across these categories, and provide search results, along with features like Lightning Search and Aggregate Search, which store and retrieve bookmarks and user clicks to enhance the search process by organizing results and providing links to previously clicked documents.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If search results are provided in an unorganized manner, then the search process is simple and fast, but the user experience becomes cumbersome and unsatisfying

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveuser experienceVSAvoidsearch result organization system
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments search results by automatically classifying them into different categories (e.g., news, sports, entertainment, business) based on the search query and result content. This segmentation organizes the overwhelming amount of search results into manageable, topic-specific groups, improving user experience without requiring complex manual organization systems.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces an automatic classification system as an intermediary between the search engine and the user. This intermediary automatically categorizes search results behind the scenes, presenting organized information to users without requiring them to manually organize or navigate complex classification structures themselves.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Ease of operation

If search results are categorized and organized, then user experience improves, but the search system complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesearch result navigationVSAvoidclassification and categorization system
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements a self-service classification system that automatically analyzes search queries and results, then categorizes them without human intervention. The system uses automated algorithms to identify relevant categories and assign results accordingly, eliminating the need for manual classification while maintaining organization benefits.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes the parameter of organization from manual to automatic classification. By transforming the classification process from a human-operated manual system to an automated algorithmic system, the patent reduces operational complexity while maintaining or improving the quality of search result organization.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Loss of information

If multiple categories are searched simultaneously, then comprehensive results are provided, but processing time increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecompleteness of search resultsVSAvoidsearch execution time
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of informationVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent performs preliminary classification of the search query into multiple relevant categories before executing the search. By pre-identifying which categories are relevant to the user's query, the system can efficiently retrieve results only from those specific categories rather than searching all categories, reducing processing time while maintaining comprehensive coverage.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent applies partial action by selecting only the most relevant categories for a given search query rather than searching all possible categories. This selective approach provides sufficiently comprehensive results for the user's needs while significantly reducing the processing time required to search across multiple categories.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Data Source

PatentUS9594835B2Lightning search aggregate
Publication Date: 2017.03.14 PINTEREST INC
  • US9594835B2 patent drawing
  • US9594835B2 patent drawing
  • US9594835B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Disclosed are methods and apparatus for executing a search query. In accordance with one embodiment, a search query is obtained. The search query is classified into one or more of a plurality of categories. The search query is executed for each of the one or more of the plurality of categories. Search results corresponding to the search query are obtained for each of the one or more of the plurality of categories. The search results are then provided for each of the one or more of the plurality of categories.