Search Query Tuning via Interaction Data Analysis

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Traditional search engine tuning is a complex and technical process that requires expertise in both search engine inner workings and document concepts, often hindered by companies lacking personnel with such knowledge, leading to inefficient tuning efforts that may degrade results for other search queries.

Innovation Solution

A search query tuning system that identifies and utilizes interaction data from user interactions, such as clicks and ratings, to automatically select and prioritize search queries for tuning, allowing for guided tuning that improves search results without manual expertise, using a separate tuning search system that mirrors the production search engine and synchronizes changes for improved relevance and accuracy.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Manufacturing precision

If traditional manual search engine tuning is performed by personnel with expertise, then search result relevance is improved, but the complexity and difficulty of the tuning process increases significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesearch result relevanceVSAvoidtuning process complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system enables self-service tuning by automatically selecting search queries based on interaction data and performing tuning operations without requiring manual expertise. The search system identifies candidate queries, evaluates tuning opportunities, and executes adjustments autonomously, allowing the system to tune itself based on observed user behavior patterns.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements feedback loops by continuously monitoring user interactions (clicks, ratings, rewrites) with search results and using this feedback to automatically identify tuning opportunities. The interaction data flows back into the system to guide query selection and tuning decisions, creating a closed-loop system that continuously improves based on real-world performance.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Manufacturing precision

If manual tuning is performed to improve results for specific search queries, then relevance for those queries improves, but results for other search queries may degrade

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesearch result relevanceVSAvoidsearch result consistency
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system applies partial action by selectively tuning only those search queries that meet specific criteria based on interaction data analysis. Rather than broadly adjusting all queries, it focuses on specific high-impact opportunities identified through automated analysis, applying tuning only where necessary and beneficial to maintain overall system consistency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes parameters by adjusting search query priorities and configurations based on observed interaction patterns. It dynamically modifies search parameters such as query weights, result rankings, and filtering criteria based on empirical data from user behavior, allowing adaptive optimization without rigid manual reconfiguration.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Manufacturing precision

If companies perform manual tuning with domain expertise, then search quality improves, but the time and resources required for tuning increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesearch result qualityVSAvoidtuning time
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system replaces the mechanical process of manual expert analysis and adjustment with automated computational processes. Instead of relying on human experts to manually review and tune queries, the system uses algorithms to automatically analyze interaction data, identify tuning opportunities, and execute adjustments, substituting human labor with automated processing.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs preliminary action by proactively identifying and preparing tuning opportunities before they become critical performance issues. It continuously monitors interaction data and pre-selects candidate queries for tuning based on emerging patterns, allowing the system to address performance degradation before it significantly impacts user experience.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

4Productivity

If automated query selection based on interaction data is implemented, then tuning efficiency improves, but the complexity of data processing increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetuning efficiencyVSAvoiddata processing complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system extracts only the essential and most relevant features from interaction data that are necessary for query selection. Rather than processing all available data in its entirety, it identifies and extracts key signals such as click patterns, rating distributions, and query rewrite frequencies, filtering out unnecessary complexity while retaining the essential information needed for effective tuning.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Data Source

PatentUS10229210B2Search query task management for search system tuning
Publication Date: 2019.03.12 ORACLE INT CORP
  • US10229210B2 patent drawing
  • US10229210B2 patent drawing
  • US10229210B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Systems, methods, and other embodiments associated with search query task management for search system tuning are described. In one embodiment, a method includes receiving interaction data that describes an interaction with a search system. The search system includes a search engine configured to process search queries to return results that include a ranked set of documents that are relevant to respective search queries. A search query to be used as a basis for search engine tuning is identified based on at least the interaction data. Request data describing a tuning request for the identified search query is transmitted to a search query tuning system. In response to the tuning request for the identified search query, the search query tuning system adds the identified search query to a set of search queries that are candidates for use as a basis for search engine tuning.