Search Ranking by Reference Count for Trustworthy Content

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current internet search methods for educational and medical content are inefficient, as they rely on keyword-based rankings that do not accurately indicate the trustworthiness or relevancy of results, making it difficult for users to find reliable and appropriate content.

Innovation Solution

A system that ranks content based on its frequency of reference by authoritative sources, such as educational institutions and healthcare providers, providing users with ordered lists that indicate the number of times the content has been referenced, thereby enhancing the visibility of trustworthy and relevant information.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If content is ranked by keyword frequency or user reviews, then search results can be generated quickly, but the accuracy and trustworthiness of the results deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesearch speedVSAvoidresult accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent introduces an intermediary mechanism (reference counting system) that mediates between the simple keyword matching and the need for accurate relevance assessment. By counting how many authoritative sources reference each content item, the system creates an objective metric that bridges the gap between fast search and accurate ranking without requiring complex manual evaluation

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces the subjective mechanical system of human review evaluation with an automated counting mechanism. Instead of relying on users to subjectively assess content quality, the system automatically counts references from authoritative sources, substituting human judgment with an objective computational metric that scales efficiently

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

2Device complexity

If content is ranked alphabetically or by basic relevancy, then the search system remains simple, but the ability to identify trustworthy content deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesystem simplicityVSAvoidcontent trustworthiness
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent changes the ranking parameter from simple alphabetical order or basic keyword relevancy to a new parameter: reference count from authoritative sources. This parameter change maintains system simplicity while dramatically improving reliability, as the reference count serves as an objective indicator of content trustworthiness without requiring complex evaluation mechanisms

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Loss of information

If user reviews and rankings are used to assess content quality, then some information about content usefulness is provided, but the trustworthiness of the assessment itself becomes difficult to determine

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecontent evaluation informationVSAvoidassessment trustworthiness
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of informationVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements a self-service assessment mechanism where authoritative sources automatically reference content based on their own judgments, eliminating the need for a separate evaluation layer. The content itself serves as evidence of its quality through the references it accumulates from authoritative sources, making the assessment inherently trustworthy without requiring additional verification

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Data Source

PatentUS11222084B2Content search and results
Publication Date: 2022.01.11 VITTORIO STEVEN MICHAEL
  • US11222084B2 patent drawing
  • US11222084B2 patent drawing
  • US11222084B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A search request for content can be initiated by a user, and the content that is relevant to the search request can be identified and presented in a manner that indicates the content's trustworthiness or relevancy. The identified content can be ranked based on the number of times the content has been referenced as well as by source that referenced the content. The relevant identified content can then be displayed in an ordered list that is ordered based on the number of times the content has been referenced. In some cases, the order may be modified by the authority of the source.