Search Relevance Tuning via User Feedback

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current search engines face challenges in delivering relevant results due to the vastness of the internet, ambiguity in user queries, and manipulation through Search Engine Optimization (SEO), requiring a more effective method to determine relevance that incorporates user feedback.

Innovation Solution

A system and method that uses user inputs to tune parameters in a relevance formula, employing machine learning techniques such as statistical classification to rank search results based on user ratings, tags, and feedback, allowing for personalized and community-driven relevance scoring.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If search engines use traditional relevance calculations based on page content and links, then the search process is simple and fast, but the relevance accuracy deteriorates due to SEO manipulation and query ambiguity

Engineering Contradiction:
Improverelevance accuracyVSAvoidsearch process complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements feedback mechanisms where user interactions (clicks, dwell time, rankings) are collected and used to retrain the learning-to-rank models. This continuous feedback loop allows the system to adapt to SEO manipulations and improve relevance accuracy over time without requiring complete system redesign.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The system dynamically adjusts model parameters and weights based on learned patterns from user feedback. By changing the importance weights of different features (content matching, link analysis, user behavior signals) rather than the overall system architecture, the patent improves accuracy while maintaining operational simplicity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Measurement precision

If search engines conduct extensive experimentation with test users to adjust relevance methods, then the accuracy improves, but the time consumption and resource requirements increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improverelevance accuracyVSAvoidadjustment time
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent enables the search engine to automatically adjust its own relevance parameters through machine learning models that process real user interaction data. This self-service capability eliminates the need for manual experimentation and test user studies, allowing continuous accuracy improvement without human intervention or time loss.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs relevance optimization continuously in the background using streaming user feedback data, rather than conducting periodic batch experiments. This continuous learning process ensures the model adapts in real-time to changing search patterns and SEO tactics without disrupting normal search operations or requiring dedicated experimentation time.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #20Continuity of useful action

3Adaptability or versatility

If search engines use simple relevance formulas, then the system is easy to operate and maintain, but the ability to handle diverse user intentions and personalize results deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveuser intention recognitionVSAvoidsystem maintenance ease
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the relevance calculation into multiple independent feature components (query-term matching, document content analysis, link structure evaluation, user behavior signals) that can be separately trained and optimized. This modular approach allows the system to handle diverse user intentions through different feature combinations while maintaining each component's simplicity for easier operation and maintenance.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The learning-to-rank framework serves multiple functions simultaneously: it personalizes results for individual users, adapts to different query types, counters SEO manipulation, and improves overall relevance. This universal approach handles diverse user intentions through a single flexible system rather than requiring separate mechanisms for each function, balancing adaptability with operational simplicity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Data Source

PatentUS11036814B2Search engine that applies feedback from users to improve search results
Publication Date: 2021.06.15 PINTEREST INC
  • US11036814B2 patent drawing
  • US11036814B2 patent drawing
  • US11036814B2 patent drawing

AI summary

The present invention is directed to methods of and systems for ranking results returned by a search engine. A method in accordance with the invention comprises determining a formula having variables and parameters, wherein the formula is for computing a relevance score for a document and a search query; and ranking the document based on the relevance score. Preferably, determining the formula comprises tuning the parameters based on user input. Preferably, the parameters are determined using a machine learning technique, such as one that includes a form of statistical classification.