Search Result Grouping with Dynamic Layouts and Visual Indicators

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current information search systems face challenges in presenting search results in a user-friendly manner, particularly due to large volumes of results, terse descriptions, limited display space, and the inability to showcase all results at once, leading to user difficulty in identifying relevant information.

Innovation Solution

A user interface that groups search results based on relevance, using varying column layouts, typefaces, color-coding, and graphical indicators to differentiate between responsive and less responsive results, allowing users to view summaries and expand to full versions as needed.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Loss of information

If search results are displayed with detailed information for each item, then the user can better understand each result, but the amount of space required to display results increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveinformation completenessVSAvoiddisplay space
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of informationVSArea of stationary object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments search results into multiple pages, with each page containing a limited number of result items. This segmentation allows detailed information to be displayed for each item while controlling the total display space required by distributing content across multiple pages.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces pagination as an additional dimension for organizing search results. Instead of displaying all results in a single linear sequence, results are organized across multiple pages, effectively using the page number dimension to manage the display space while maintaining information completeness.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

2Loss of time

If all search results are displayed on a single page, then the user can see all results at once, but the display area required increases significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvenavigation timeVSAvoiddisplay area
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of timeVSArea of stationary object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent divides search results into multiple pages, displaying a manageable number of results on each page. This segmentation reduces the display area required on any single page while minimizing navigation time by keeping frequently accessed results on the first few pages.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements dynamic pagination where the number of results per page and the total number of pages adjusts based on the available display area and the total number of search results. This dynamic adjustment optimizes the balance between navigation time and display area utilization.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

3Ease of operation

If search results are presented in a uniform format, then the interface is simple to implement, but the user cannot quickly identify relevant information among diverse results

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveinterface simplicityVSAvoidinformation retrieval efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies local quality by allowing different result items to have different formatting characteristics based on their relevance and type. High-relevance results can be displayed with more prominent formatting, while less relevant results use simpler formatting, helping users quickly identify important information while maintaining overall interface simplicity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The patent uses color changes and graphical indicators to differentiate between results of varying relevance. This visual differentiation helps users quickly identify relevant information without complicating the interface, as the color coding provides intuitive cues about result quality.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #32Color changes

4Loss of information

If the description of each search result is made more comprehensive, then the user can better assess relevance, but the space required to display the same number of results decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedescription qualityVSAvoidresults per page
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of informationVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments both the display space and the result descriptions. By providing comprehensive descriptions for each result item and organizing results across multiple pages, the system maintains high description quality while preserving the ability to display multiple results through strategic use of pagination.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Data Source

PatentUS7620631B2Pyramid view
Publication Date: 2009.11.17 MICROSOFT TECHNOLOGY LICENSING LLC
  • US7620631B2 patent drawing
  • US7620631B2 patent drawing
  • US7620631B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A system for displaying information to a user is disclosed. The system comprises a grouping module that organizes data items into groups that are ranked based upon at least one attribute of the data items. Also included is a presentation module that presents the ranked groups of data items to a user along with a group indicator. Methods for using the disclosed system are additionally provided.