Vehicle Seat Articulation Locking with Dual-Action Return Device

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing articulation systems for vehicle seats fail to ensure both articulations are completely locked in the absence of actuation and are prone to damage from opposing forces, leading to incomplete locking and potential damage to the manoeuvring member.

Innovation Solution

A dual-action return device is used to return the manoeuvring member to its neutral position independently of the control members, allowing for complete locking without actuation and preventing damage by allowing displacement in a misuse direction without affecting the control members, utilizing a helical spring and guide hub for compactness and ease of manufacture.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If the manoeuvring member is fixed to control members with angular clearance, then one articulation can be unlocked, but the other articulation remains unlocked even in the rest position

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveunlocking capabilityVSAvoidlocking reliability in rest position
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent introduces a dual-action return device as an intermediary mechanism between the manoeuvring member and the control members. This device includes a return member with opposite ends that can push the control members in opposite directions, ensuring both articulations are reliably locked in the rest position while still allowing unlocking when actuated. The intermediary device mediates the force transmission to achieve synchronized locking of both articulations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Ease of operation

If the manoeuvring member is directly connected to control members, then unlocking is achieved, but the manoeuvring member may be damaged by opposing forces

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveunlocking functionVSAvoidmanoeuvring member durability
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSStrength

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies beforehand cushioning by incorporating a return member that can be compressed to absorb opposing forces before they reach the manoeuvring member. The return member acts as a cushioning element that deforms under excessive force, protecting the manoeuvring member from damage while still allowing normal unlocking operation. This preventive measure is built into the system design to handle misuse scenarios.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #11Beforehand cushioning (Prior cushioning)

3Reliability

If complex means are used to ensure both articulations lock correctly, then locking reliability improves, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesynchronized lockingVSAvoidmechanism complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent achieves synchronized locking of both articulations using a single dual-action return device that performs multiple functions: it returns the manoeuvring member to the neutral position, pushes both control members to the locked position, and protects against opposing forces. This multi-functional approach eliminates the need for separate locking mechanisms for each articulation, reducing overall device complexity while maintaining reliability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

Ensures both articulations are correctly locked without actuation and can be unlocked by a single manoeuvring member, preventing damage to the mechanism, while maintaining compactness and ease of manufacturing.

Implementation Method 1

the control members of the two articulations each being urged in a resilient manner into the locked position by a return member arranged between the fittings

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectResilient force: Elasticity

Implementation Method 2

the dual-action return device comprises a first helical spring having two end tabs and a guide hub in which the manoeuvring member is received substantially without clearance

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectHelical spring: Spring

Data Source

PatentUS8668269B2Articulation system and vehicle seat comprising such an articulation system
Publication Date: 2014.03.11 FAURECIA SIEGES D AUTOMOBILE SA
  • US8668269B2 patent drawing
  • US8668269B2 patent drawing
  • US8668269B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Articulation system comprising first and second articulations, each comprising two fittings which are pivotable relative to one another and a locking mechanism which comprises a control member which is mobile between a locked position and an unlocked position, the control members each being urged in a resilient manner into the locked position by a return member, a maneuvering member which is mobile in rotation between a neutral position, a position of misuse and an actuating position, in order to unlock the control members when said maneuvering member is displaced in a first direction, said maneuvering member being returned from the position of misuse and the actuating position into the neutral position by a dual-action return device.