Seat Back Armrest Restrictor Mechanism

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing seat designs with movable armrests face challenges in retaining the armrest in position relative to the seat back when the seat is moved from an upright to a folded position, often requiring increased passenger effort or complex mechanisms like interference fits or mechanical latches.

Innovation Solution

A seat assembly with an armrest restrictor that includes a restrictor body attached to the seat back, featuring a block that engages a stop path to prevent armrest movement when the seat is folded, and a biasing element to return to a release position when the seat is upright, allowing armrest movement between stowed and use positions.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If an interference fit is provided between the armrest and seat back, then the armrest is retained in position relative to the seat back, but the amount of force the passenger must apply to move the armrest increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvearmrest retentionVSAvoidarmrest movement
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The armrest restrictor dynamically changes its retention characteristics based on seat back position. When the seat back is in the upright position, the restrictor allows free armrest movement. When the seat back is folded, the restrictor engages to prevent armrest movement, thus adapting the retention mechanism to different operational states without increasing passenger effort during normal use.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The restrictor body rotates between a first position (when seat back is upright) and a second position (when seat back is folded), changing the geometric parameters of the block relative to the stop path. This parameter change enables the system to provide retention only when needed, without continuously increasing the force required for armrest movement.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Reliability

If a mechanical latch is provided to retain the armrest, then the armrest is retained in position, but the device complexity increases and the passenger must reach and interact with a release

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvearmrest retentionVSAvoidlatch mechanism
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The armrest restrictor is a passive mechanism that automatically engages and disengages based on the seat back position. The restrictor body rotates freely with the seat back, and the block automatically enters or exits the stop path depending on the seat back angle. This self-service mechanism eliminates the need for passenger interaction with releases or complex control systems.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The restrictor body serves multiple functions: it acts as a structural component attached to the seat back, a retention mechanism when engaged, and a passive follower that moves with the seat back. This multi-functionality reduces the need for separate dedicated latch components and control mechanisms.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

3Ease of operation

If the armrest is allowed to move freely relative to the seat back, then the passenger can easily position the armrest, but the armrest may undesirably remain deployed when the seat back is moved upright

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvearmrest positioningVSAvoidarmrest retention
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The restrictor body is pre-positioned and biased to engage the stop path before the seat back completes its folding motion. The spring bias ensures the block is already in place to prevent armrest movement, counteracting the armrest weight's tendency to cause unwanted deployment before the retention mechanism is fully engaged.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #9Preliminary anti-action

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The armrest restrictor effectively retains the armrest in position during seat movement, reducing passenger effort and eliminating the need for complex latches, while allowing easy transition between stowed and use positions.

Implementation Method 1

The armrest restrictor includes a biasing element that biases the restrictor body toward the block position

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectSpring: Spring

Data Source

PatentUS10227027B2Seat back with pivotable armrest and armrest restrictor
Publication Date: 2019.03.12 LEAR CORP
  • US10227027B2 patent drawing
  • US10227027B2 patent drawing
  • US10227027B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A seat assembly includes a seat back that is mounted on a base for relative movement between a first seat position and a second seat position. An armrest is mounted on the seat back for relative movement between a stowed position and a use position. An armrest restrictor prevents movement of the armrest relative to the seat back when the seat back is moved from the first seat position toward the second seat position and allows movement of the armrest relative to the seat back when the seat back is in the first seat position.