Seat Belt Pretensioner with Staged Pulling for Side Collision Restraint

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

In far side collisions, existing occupant protection systems, such as airbags, fail to adequately restrain the upper body, leading to severe injuries as the occupant's head and body are shaken and collide with other occupants or interior members, due to insufficient restriction of movement in the vehicle width direction.

Innovation Solution

An occupant protection device incorporating a seat belt system with a locking tongue, shoulder-belt puller, lap-belt puller, and a control unit that detects side collisions, rapidly increasing the tensile force of the shoulder belt after initial restraint of the lap belt to prevent excessive movement and reduce chest injuries by transitioning the locking tongue state and pretensioner forces.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If existing occupant protection systems (airbags) are used in far side collisions, then the upper body is not adequately restrained, but the occupant's head and body collide with other occupants or interior members causing severe injuries

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveoccupant protection effectivenessVSAvoidhead and body collision with interior members
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The seat belt system is divided into two independent pullers: a lap-belt puller for the lower body and a shoulder-belt puller for the upper body. This segmentation allows each puller to independently control the restraint force applied to different body regions, enabling the lap belt to restrain the hips first and the shoulder belt to subsequently restrain the upper body, preventing head and body collision with interior members

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The control unit activates the lap-belt puller before the shoulder-belt puller in a two-stage sequence. The preliminary action of the lap-belt puller restrains the occupant's hips and lower body first, stabilizing the base of support. Subsequently, the shoulder-belt puller activates to restrain the upper body, preventing excessive forward and sideways movement that would cause collision with interior members

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Reliability

If the shoulder belt is pulled with high tensile force immediately in side collisions, then the upper body is restrained, but the chest may be injured due to excessive force

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveupper body restraintVSAvoidchest injury
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The control unit implements periodic action by activating the shoulder-belt puller in two distinct stages: a first pulling state with a predetermined preliminary pulling force, and a second pulling state with a larger pulling force. This staged approach allows the chest to gradually adapt to the restraint force, preventing immediate excessive force that would cause injury while still achieving effective upper body restraint

Inventive Principle:
Principle #19Periodic action

Solution Approach 2:

The lap-belt puller is activated in preliminary action before the shoulder-belt puller. By first restraining the hips and lower body, the occupant's center of gravity is stabilized, reducing the inertial forces acting on the chest. This preliminary stabilization allows the subsequent shoulder belt activation to apply force more safely without causing chest injury

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

3Ease of operation

If the locking tongue remains in unlock state during side collision, then the seat belt allows movement, but the occupant experiences excessive displacement in the vehicle width direction

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveseat belt flexibilityVSAvoidoccupant movement restriction
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The locking tongue is designed with dynamic state switching capability, transitioning from an unlock state during normal operation to a lock state during side collisions. This dynamic adaptation allows the system to maintain seat belt flexibility during everyday use while providing rigid movement restriction when collision is detected, ensuring both ease of operation and occupant protection reliability

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The control unit activates the locking tongue to the lock state in preliminary action before the main restraint phase. By locking the tongue early in the collision sequence, the system ensures that the seat belt webbing cannot slip through the buckle, preventing any excessive displacement in the vehicle width direction while maintaining the flexibility benefits of the unlock state during normal operation

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

Effectively restricts occupant movement in the vehicle width direction, reducing the risk of chest injuries by converting kinetic energy into rotational motion, thereby minimizing the distance of head and upper body displacement and preventing collisions with other occupants or interior members.

Implementation Method 1

a lap-belt puller that is capable of pulling the lap belt to apply a tensile force thereto

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectTensile force: Tension

Implementation Method 2

a shoulder-belt puller that is capable of pulling the shoulder belt to apply a tensile force thereto

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectTensile force: Tension

Implementation Method 3

The locking tongue is capable of switching between an unlock state in which the seat belt is allowed to move with the locking tongue being between the shoulder belt and the lap belt and a lock state in which movement thereof is restricted

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectMechanical locking: Mechanical Fastener

Implementation Method 4

The side-collision detector is configured to detect a side collision or a precursor thereof

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectCollision detection: Accelerometer

Data Source

PatentUS10953829B2Occupant protection device
Publication Date: 2021.03.23 SUBARU CORP
  • US10953829B2 patent drawing
  • US10953829B2 patent drawing
  • US10953829B2 patent drawing

AI summary

An occupant protection device including a seat belt that includes a shoulder belt and a lap belt, a locking tongue that is capable of switching between an unlock state and a lock state, a shoulder-belt puller that is capable of pulling the shoulder belt, a lap-belt puller that is capable of pulling the lap belt, a side-collision detector that detects a side collision or a precursor thereof, and a control unit that changes a state of the locking tongue into the lock state and a state of the lap-belt puller into a first pulling state in which the lap-belt puller pulls the lap belt and that subsequently changes a state of the shoulder-belt puller into a second pulling state in which the shoulder-belt puller pulls the shoulder belt when the side-collision detector detects the side collision that occurs opposite an occupant or the precursor thereof.