Aircraft Seat Closing Wall Sliding Mechanism

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing aircraft seat closing devices can obstruct passage during malfunctions and may not deploy fully due to mechanical limitations, compromising passenger privacy and evacuation safety.

Innovation Solution

A seat unit with a sliding closing wall and a locking system that includes a retaining member, stopper, and gripping means, allowing the closing wall to move freely for evacuation and deploy regardless of its length, ensuring unobstructed passage and enhanced privacy.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If the closing wall is designed to pivot on a vertical hinge to clear passage during malfunction, then passenger access to aisle is enabled, but the door may obstruct passage when pivoted from normal position

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepassenger access to aisleVSAvoidpassage obstruction
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The closing wall is extracted from the constrained pivoting mechanism and allowed to move independently along the longitudinal axis of the seat unit. This extraction from the vertical hinge constraint eliminates the obstruction problem while maintaining access functionality.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The closing wall transitions from a static pivoting door to a dynamic sliding panel that can move freely along the longitudinal axis. This dynamic movement capability allows the wall to clear passage completely when needed while maintaining its closing function when repositioned.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Reliability

If the closing device requires the door to be sufficiently extended so that the hinge protrudes from storage compartment, then the closing function is achieved, but deployment is not possible in significant malfunction scenarios

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveclosing functionVSAvoiddeployment capability
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The closing wall is segmented from the support means, allowing independent movement and positioning. This segmentation enables the closing wall to function independently even when the support means is malfunctioning or not fully deployed.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The closing wall is designed to be able to close the passage independently before any malfunction occurs. This preliminary capability ensures that even in significant malfunction scenarios, the closing function remains available through manual operation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

3Stability of the object's composition

If the closing wall is locked to the support means, then stable closing is achieved, but free movement for evacuation is prevented

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveclosing stabilityVSAvoidmovement freedom
Core Design Contradiction:
Stability of the object's compositionVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The locking system transitions from a permanently locked state to a dynamic system that can switch between locked and unlocked states. This dynamic capability allows the closing wall to be stable during normal operation but freely movable when evacuation is needed.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The locking system acts as an intermediary mechanism between the closing wall and support means. It provides controlled connection that can be engaged or disengaged, mediating between the need for stability and the need for movement freedom.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The solution prevents passage obstruction during emergencies and maintains passenger privacy by allowing the closing wall to slide freely, even in malfunction scenarios, facilitating evacuation and enhancing comfort.

Implementation Method 1

the retaining element consists of a ball mounted on a spring

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectSpring: Spring

Implementation Method 2

the closing wall is able to come to rest by gravity against a bottom of the housing when the locking system is in the unlocked state

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectGravity: Gravitation

Implementation Method 3

the bottom of the housing is covered with a layer of a coating with a low coefficient of friction

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectFriction: Friction

Data Source

PatentEP3606817B2Device for closing a passage between two seat units
Publication Date: 2023.12.13 SAFRAN SEATS
  • EP3606817B2 patent drawingFigure 1~2
  • EP3606817B2 patent drawingFigure 3a~3b
  • EP3606817B2 patent drawingFigure 4a~4b

AI summary

The invention relates mainly to a closure device (40), notably for closing a passage formed in a cabin of an aircraft, comprising: - a support means (41) that is able to slide along a slideway (42) in a sliding direction (D), - a closing wall (46) that is able to close off the passage, and - a locking system (45) that is able to take up a locked state, in which the locking system (45) ensures a mechanical connection between the closing wall (46) and the support means (41), such that the closing wall (46) is movable with the support means (41) in the sliding direction (D), characterized in that, notably in the case of a malfunction, the locking system (45) is able to pass into an unlocked state, in which the closing wall (46) is disconnected from the support means (41), such that the closing wall (46) is movable on its own in the sliding direction (D).