Vehicle Seat Folding Element with Yielding Stop Means

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing vehicle seat designs with folding elements on the backrest pose a safety risk during frontal impacts, as they can act as rigid obstacles, increasing the Head Injury Criterion (HIC) beyond regulatory thresholds, and fail to ensure passenger safety without significantly increasing weight or compromising comfort.

Innovation Solution

A vehicle seat with a folding element, such as a shelf, mounted to pivot about an axis with stop means that allow it to assume a substantially vertical position and extend towards the front under impact, featuring increasing resistance mechanisms like elastic springs or locking pieces that yield under predetermined forces, ensuring the element does not obstruct the passenger's progression.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Volume of moving object

If a folding element (tray table) is fixed to the backrest in a vertical position, then it occupies minimal space and is easy to store, but it acts as a rigid obstacle during frontal impact, increasing head injury risk

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvespace occupied by folding elementVSAvoidhead injury risk during impact
Core Design Contradiction:
Volume of moving objectVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The folding element is designed to pivot dynamically between a vertical stored position and a horizontal deployed position. During normal use, it remains vertical to minimize space. During impact, it can rotate forward to follow the passenger's head movement, converting from a rigid obstacle to a dynamic safety feature that reduces head injury risk.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes the angular parameter of the folding element from 0 degrees (vertical) to 90 degrees (horizontal) based on impact conditions. The articulation mechanism allows the element to change its orientation parameter dynamically, transitioning from a space-saving configuration to a safety-oriented configuration during collision events.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Strength

If the folding element is made rigid to maintain structural strength, then it provides stability, but it increases the force transmitted to the passenger's head during impact

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvestructural strength of folding elementVSAvoidimpact force transmitted to passenger
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSForce

Solution Approach 1:

The folding element maintains rigidity for structural stability during normal use but is designed to rotate dynamically during impact. The articulation mechanism allows the rigid element to change its angular position, following the passenger's head movement forward during collision, thereby reducing the relative velocity and impact force transmitted to the head.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The articulation mechanism acts as an intermediary between the rigid folding element and the passenger's head. It allows the rigid element to move in a controlled manner during impact, mediating the interaction between the structural component and the passenger to reduce harmful forces while maintaining the element's structural integrity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

3Adaptability or versatility

If the folding element is positioned horizontally for use, then it provides functionality for the passenger, but it obstructs the path of the passenger's head during frontal impact

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefunctional positions of folding elementVSAvoidobstruction to passenger head movement
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The folding element is designed to be dynamic rather than static. During normal use, it can be positioned horizontally to provide functionality. During impact, it rotates forward to follow the passenger's head movement, eliminating obstruction. The system adapts its position based on operational vs. safety conditions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

4Object-affected harmful factors

If the seat back is made deformable to absorb impact energy, then it reduces head injury, but a rigid folding element fixed to it creates a conflict between energy absorption and structural support

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvehead injury reductionVSAvoidstructural support of seat back
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-affected harmful factorsVSStrength

Solution Approach 1:

The folding element is designed to pivot dynamically during impact, allowing it to follow the deformable seat back's movement while maintaining its own structural integrity. This dynamic configuration resolves the conflict between the deformable seat back's energy absorption function and the folding element's structural support role.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The solution effectively reduces the risk of head injury during frontal crashes by allowing the folding element to pivot and absorb impact forces, maintaining safety without increasing the seat's weight or compromising comfort, thus meeting safety standards while optimizing passenger safety and comfort.

Implementation Method 1

at least one elastic spring, arranged behind the folding element, exerting a force on the folding element, in the event of pivoting of the folding element beyond a certain position

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElasticity: Elasticity

Implementation Method 2

positioned behind the folding element, comprising at least one element chosen from a foam material and an elastic spring

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectCompression: Compression

Data Source

PatentEP2978633B1Vehicle seat equipped with a foldable element, such as a folding table
Publication Date: 2019.09.25 EXPLISEAT
  • EP2978633B1 patent drawingFigure 1~2
  • EP2978633B1 patent drawingFigure 3A~3B
  • EP2978633B1 patent drawingFigure 4A~4B

AI summary

The transport vehicle seat makes it possible to avoid the violent impact of the head of a passenger located on the seat positioned behind and to dampen the violent rocking forward of this passenger in the event of a frontal impact of the transport vehicle. The seat has a pivot-mounted fold-down element (10), such as a tray, positioned on the rear face of a backrest. It has stop means (14) that keep the fold-down element (10) in a substantially vertical position, these stop means (14) being able to give during an impact applied to the fold-down element (10) and to allow the latter to continue swinging in the direction of the backrest to which it is fixed. The stop means has, relative to the substantially vertical position, increasing-resistance means that are able to keep the fold-down element (10) in the substantially vertical position, in the absence of said impact, and are able to allow the continuation of pivoting of the fold-down element under the effect of an impact.