Vehicle Seat Frame Side Structure With Integrated Automatic Belt Unit

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing vehicle seat structures with automatic belt units face challenges in optimizing structural space and force flow, while also requiring cost-effective assembly methods.

Innovation Solution

A vehicle seat structure with a structural component housing an automatic belt unit, connected in a positive-locking, materially engaging, or non-positive-locking manner to another load-bearing component, optimizing space and force distribution, and featuring a method for assembling these components to ensure efficient and cost-effective integration.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Volume of moving object

If the automatic belt unit is arranged in a hollow space of the structural component, then the structural space is optimized, but the assembly complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvestructural spaceVSAvoidassembly complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Volume of moving objectVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The automatic belt unit is nested within the hollow space of the structural component, allowing one component to be placed inside another. This nesting approach optimizes structural space by utilizing the existing hollow volume, while the integrated design reduces assembly complexity by pre-positioning the belt unit within the structural component during manufacturing.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #7Nested doll (Nesting)

2Strength

If the structural component is connected in a positive-locking manner to another component, then the strength and rigidity are improved, but the manufacturing cost increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvestrength and rigidityVSAvoidmanufacturing cost
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The connection system is segmented into modular positive-locking elements that can be independently manufactured and assembled. This segmentation allows for standardized production of connection components, reducing overall manufacturing cost while maintaining the strength and rigidity benefits of positive-locking connections.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

3Force

If the structural component forms part of the seat substructure, then the force flow is optimized, but the device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveforce flowVSAvoiddevice complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ForceVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The structural component serves multiple functions: it provides structural support, houses the automatic belt unit, and forms an integral part of the seat substructure for optimized force flow. This multi-functionality approach consolidates several components into one, reducing overall device complexity while achieving optimized force distribution during vehicle occupancy and crash events.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Data Source

PatentUS12122320B2Vehicle seat structure and method for assembling a vehicle seat structure
Publication Date: 2024.10.22 ADIENT US LLC
  • US12122320B2 patent drawing
  • US12122320B2 patent drawing
  • US12122320B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A vehicle seat structure has a structural component which has an automatic belt unit. The automatic belt unit is arranged in a hollow space of the structural component and the structural component is connected in a positive-locking and/or materially engaging and/or non-positive-locking manner to at least one other component of the vehicle seat structure. The vehicle seat structure has a seat substructure and the structural component which has an automatic belt unit forms a component of the seat substructure. The structural component which has the automatic belt unit forms a seat frame side portion of the seat substructure A method for assembling such a vehicle seat structure is also provided.