Vehicle Seat Cushion Heating Circuit Uniformity

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

The existing electrical circuits based on conductive ink in motor vehicle seat padding suffer from increased resistance and decreasing current intensity as they move away from connection points, leading to non-uniform heating.

Innovation Solution

The use of a conductive ink with higher intrinsic conductivity for the buses and a thicker deposition for the buses compared to microcircuits minimizes electrical resistance, ensuring a uniform power supply to microcircuits and maintaining current intensity across the padding.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of manufacture

If conductive ink is used to form electrical circuits in heating mats, then geometric freedom and ease of manufacturing are improved, but electrical resistance increases and current intensity decreases as distance from connection points increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvegeometric freedom of circuit designVSAvoiduniformity of heating
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies local quality by differentiating the ink deposition between buses and microcircuits. Buses receive a first ink with higher intrinsic conductivity, while microcircuits receive a second ink with lower conductivity. This local differentiation allows buses to maintain low resistance for current transport while microcircuits provide adequate heating resistance, resolving the contradiction between manufacturing freedom and heating uniformity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes the conductivity parameter of the conductive ink based on the circuit element type. By using ink with different conductivity values for buses versus microcircuits, the system optimizes current distribution throughout the heating mat, ensuring uniform heating while maintaining the geometric flexibility of printed circuits.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Device complexity

If the same ink is used for both buses and microcircuits, then manufacturing complexity is reduced, but electrical resistance of buses increases with distance from connection points

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecircuit production complexityVSAvoidcurrent intensity uniformity
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements local quality by assigning different ink properties to different circuit components. Buses are formed with high-conductivity ink to minimize resistance over long distances, while microcircuits use lower-conductivity ink for adequate heating. This resolves the contradiction by localizing material properties to functional requirements.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The patent segments the circuit into two functional types: buses for current transport and microcircuits for heating. Each segment receives ink optimized for its specific function, with buses getting higher conductivity ink to maintain current intensity across the mat surface.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

3Reliability

If thicker ink deposition is used for buses, then electrical resistance is minimized and current supply is improved, but manufacturing precision requirements increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveelectrical conductivity of busesVSAvoidink deposition control
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent changes the conductivity parameter of the ink rather than solely relying on thickness variations. By using ink with inherently different conductivity values for buses versus microcircuits, the system achieves reliable current distribution while maintaining manageable manufacturing precision requirements through material property differentiation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This arrangement results in substantially uniform heating of the padding, providing consistent comfort for passengers by maintaining current intensity and reducing resistance across the circuit.

Implementation Method 1

said ink being based on a polymer binder in which conductive particles are dispersed

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElectrical conduction: Conduction (electrical)

Implementation Method 2

microcircuits shaped so as to form resistors capable of heating said padding by passing an electric current

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectJoule heating: Joule Heating

Data Source

PatentEP3535158B1Sitz- oder lehnenpolsterung eines kraftfahrzeugsitzes
Publication Date: 2021.03.17 TESCA FRANCE
  • EP3535158B1 patent drawingFigure 1~2

AI summary

The invention concerns a cushioning comprising a heating layer (4) comprising an electric circuit (5) made from conductive ink, said circuit comprising at least one first (7) and at least one second (8a, 8b) bus extending longitudinally, said buses being connected together by a plurality of printed microcircuits (12) shaped so as to form resistances capable of heating said cushioning, said cushioning having, as required, either one of the following features: said buses are made from a first ink and said microcircuits are made from a second ink, said first ink having a higher intrinsic conductivity than that of the second ink; or indeed said bus and microcircuits are made from the same ink, said ink being deposited more thickly for said buses than for said microcircuits, such that said buses provide minimised electrical resistance to the flow of current.