Vehicle Seat Image Comparison for Child Seat Classification

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing seat occupancy detection systems struggle to reliably differentiate between a child seat occupied by a large child and a person sitting on a vehicle seat, particularly due to limited training data and similar features in images, leading to potential misclassification.

Innovation Solution

A system utilizing a pre-trained machine learning classification network, such as a Siamese neural network, compares current vehicle seat images with stored reference images to determine the presence of a child seat, enhancing accuracy by leveraging embeddings and confidence scores, and updating reference images when uncertainty arises.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If conventional machine learning algorithms are used for seat occupancy classification, then the system can detect seat occupancy states, but it struggles to reliably differentiate between child seats and adult occupants due to limited training data and similar image features

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveclassification accuracyVSAvoiddetection reliability
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary actions by capturing and storing reference images of unoccupied seats before occupancy detection is needed. These reference images are used to initialize the classification network, enabling more accurate differentiation between child seats and adult occupants by providing a baseline for comparison.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements feedback mechanisms by continuously monitoring classification confidence scores and adjusting the classification process accordingly. When confidence is low, the system captures additional reference images and re-trains the classification network, using this feedback to improve future classification accuracy and reliability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Measurement precision

If the system captures and processes multiple reference images for each seat, then it improves the ability to distinguish child seats from adult occupants, but it increases the complexity of the detection system

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvechild seat detection accuracyVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system segments the seat detection process into distinct phases: capturing reference images of unoccupied seats, processing these images through the classification network, and using the results to detect actual occupancy. This segmentation allows the system to manage complexity by handling different aspects of detection separately and systematically.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system creates copies of reference images for training and comparison purposes. By capturing multiple reference images and using them to train the classification network, the system leverages copied data to improve accuracy without requiring additional hardware complexity, as the same camera and processor are used for both reference capture and occupancy detection.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

3Reliability

If the system uses a pre-trained machine learning classification network with multiple reference images, then it improves the reliability of seat state determination, but it increases the processing time and computational resources required

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveseat state determination reliabilityVSAvoidprocessing time
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary processing by capturing and storing reference images when seats are unoccupied, before actual occupancy detection is needed. This advance preparation reduces processing time during critical detection moments, as the classification network already has reference data ready for comparison and can quickly determine seat states.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system dynamically adjusts processing parameters based on confidence scores. When the classification network produces high-confidence results, the system reduces processing steps and quickly outputs results. When confidence is low, it increases processing by capturing additional reference images and re-training, optimizing the balance between reliability and processing time.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Data Source

PatentUS12573214B2Child seat detection for a seat occupancy classification system
Publication Date: 2026.03.10 APTIV TECHNOLOGIES AG
  • US12573214B2 patent drawing
  • US12573214B2 patent drawing
  • US12573214B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Disclosed are safety improvements for vehicles, including methods and systems of child seat detection in collaboration with a seat occupancy classification system. Corresponding systems, vehicles, and computer programs are also presented. In an aspect, a method includes receiving a current image showing a region of a vehicle seat currently captured inside the vehicle and retrieving one or more reference images, wherein at least one reference image is a previously stored first reference image of the vehicle seat being unoccupied. The method further includes determining a seat state of the vehicle seat by processing the current image and one or more reference images with a pre-trained machine learning classification network and determining, based on an output from the network, the seat state indicating at least whether the vehicle seat in the current image includes a mounted child seat. Finally, the method forwards the seat state to the seat occupancy classification system.