Seat Back Locking Mechanism for Submarining Prevention

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Passengers in vehicles are at risk of submarining under restraining devices when reclined, as existing systems fail to effectively manage seat recline angles during collisions, leading to increased injury risk.

Innovation Solution

A submarining avoidance system that includes a locking mechanism preventing the seat back from reclining beyond a predefined angle unless a secondary restraining device is activated, which can be a three-point or multi-point harness, and is integrated with sensors and actuators to control seat rotation based on passenger restraint.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If the seat back is allowed to recline freely, then passenger comfort and convenience are improved, but the risk of submarining under the restraining device increases during collisions

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveseat recline convenienceVSAvoidsubmarining risk
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The locking mechanism transitions from a static fixed-position design to a dynamic state-changing design. It automatically switches between locked and unlocked states based on whether the restraining device is detected as worn, allowing the seat back to be restricted during non-restrained conditions while permitting full recline when properly restrained

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system incorporates sensors that detect whether the restraining device is worn and provide feedback to the locking mechanism. This feedback loop enables the locking mechanism to automatically adjust its state (locked or unlocked) based on the detected condition, creating a responsive safety system

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Object-affected harmful factors

If a locking mechanism is added to prevent submarining, then passenger safety is improved, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesubmarining riskVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-affected harmful factorsVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent combines multiple functions into integrated components. The locking mechanism is merged with the seat assembly, sensors are integrated into the restraining device or seat structure, and the control system unifies detection and actuation functions, reducing overall system complexity despite adding safety functionality

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The locking mechanism operates autonomously based on sensor detection without requiring manual intervention. The system self-regulates by automatically locking or unlocking based on whether the restraining device is worn, eliminating the need for complex manual control interfaces

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Data Source

PatentUS11173815B2Submarining avoidance system
Publication Date: 2021.11.16 WAYMO LLC
  • US11173815B2 patent drawing
  • US11173815B2 patent drawing
  • US11173815B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Aspects of the disclosure relate to reducing the likelihood of injury to a passenger in a collision. In one example, a system for reducing the likelihood of a passenger submarining, may include a restraining device for restraining the passenger. A second restraining device for further restraining the passenger may also be included in the system. A locking mechanism may be configured to prevent a seat back from reclining when the second restraining device is not activated.