Vehicle Seat Occupant Detection Threshold Logic

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing occupant determining devices in vehicles face issues with delayed state switching due to temporary load variations from occupant posture changes, leading to incorrect and prolonged occupant type determinations.

Innovation Solution

The implementation of a controller that sets multiple determination thresholds and corresponding delaying times, where larger thresholds have shorter delaying times, allowing for immediate and accurate determination of an adult occupant based on load applied to the seat.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Stability of the object's composition

If a low-pass filter or delaying transaction is applied to prevent frequent switching of occupant determination state, then the stability of occupant determination is improved, but the response speed to actual occupant state changes is reduced

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvestability of occupant determination stateVSAvoidresponse speed to occupant state changes
Core Design Contradiction:
Stability of the object's compositionVSSpeed

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies dynamics by making the delaying time variable rather than fixed. The controller dynamically adjusts the delaying time based on the magnitude of load variation: when load variation is large (indicating actual occupant state change), the delaying time is reduced or eliminated, allowing immediate state switching; when load variation is small (indicating temporary posture change), the delaying time is extended to prevent frequent switching. This dynamic adjustment resolves the contradiction between stability and response speed.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes the parameter of delaying time based on the degree of load variation. By setting different delaying times corresponding to different load variation thresholds, the system adapts its response characteristics to the actual situation. This parameter change allows the system to maintain stability under normal conditions while responding quickly to actual occupant state changes.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Reliability

If a fixed delaying time is applied to switch occupant determination state, then frequent switching due to temporary load variation is prevented, but the accuracy of immediate occupant state detection is reduced

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvereliability of occupant determinationVSAvoidprecision of occupant state detection
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The system dynamically adjusts the delaying time based on the magnitude of load variation. When the load variation exceeds a threshold (indicating actual occupant state change), the delaying time is reduced, allowing immediate and accurate detection of the new state. When load variation is within the threshold (indicating temporary posture change), the delaying time is extended to maintain reliability. This dynamic approach resolves the contradiction between reliability and measurement precision.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes the delaying time parameter according to the load variation magnitude. By setting multiple delaying time values corresponding to different load variation levels, the system achieves both high reliability (by filtering out temporary variations) and high measurement precision (by quickly responding to actual state changes).

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Measurement precision

If multiple determination thresholds with different delaying times are set, then the accuracy of adult occupant determination is improved, but the device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprecision of adult occupant determinationVSAvoidcomplexity of threshold setting and processing
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the determination process by dividing it into multiple threshold levels (first determination threshold and second determination threshold). Each threshold has its own delaying time setting. This segmentation allows the system to handle different occupancy scenarios with appropriate precision while keeping each individual threshold comparison simple, thus improving overall measurement precision without excessive complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements a multi-threshold system that provides more determination levels than a single threshold would. This partial excessive action (using more thresholds than the minimum one) improves precision for distinguishing adult occupants from children or empty seats, while the complexity increase is managed by using simple comparison logic for each threshold level.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Data Source

PatentUS7584037B2Occupant determining device
Publication Date: 2009.09.01 AISIN SEIKI KK
  • US7584037B2 patent drawing
  • US7584037B2 patent drawing
  • US7584037B2 patent drawing

AI summary

An occupant determining device includes a load detecting sensor provided on a seat body and a controller. The controller calculates a detected load value based on an output value of the load detecting sensor and performs occupant determination based on the detected load value. The occupant determination state is switched to an adult determination state when a certain delaying time elapses after the detected load value exceeds a determination threshold. The controller sets plural determination thresholds, and the larger each determination threshold being exceeded by the detected load value is, the shorter the delaying time is set.