Vehicle Seat Sidewall Bladder With Torsion Spring Preload

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing motor vehicle seat systems with fluid-fillable bladders for active sidewall adjustment require expensive and complex pneumatic systems to ensure quick response times, leading to significant delays and increased costs.

Innovation Solution

A motor vehicle seat system with a torsion spring preload mechanism and a fluid-fillable bladder that allows for rapid adjustment of sidewalls, using a controller and valve to fill or empty the bladder, enabling quick response times without the need for powerful pump devices, with the preload force ensuring no play between components and accelerating filling and evacuation processes.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If fluid-fillable bladders are used for adjusting sidewalls, then active support against centrifugal force is provided, but the system requires expensive pneumatic systems with high delivery rate to ensure quick response times

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveactive support effectivenessVSAvoidpneumatic system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent extracts the complex pneumatic system from the solution and replaces it with a simple manual valve mechanism. The bladder adjustment is achieved by connecting the valve directly to the bladder, eliminating the need for expensive pump devices while maintaining the ability to adjust sidewalls for active support

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces expensive, complex pneumatic systems with simple, inexpensive components including manual valves and basic bladder mechanisms. This substitution achieves the same functional outcome (sidewall adjustment) with significantly reduced system complexity and cost

Inventive Principle:
Principle #27Cheap short-living objects (Disposable)

2Reliability

If fluid-fillable bladders are used for adjusting sidewalls, then active support is provided, but significant delays occur in filling and evacuating the bladders

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveactive support effectivenessVSAvoidresponse time
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent pre-positions the manual valve in a ready state connected to the bladder, allowing immediate filling or evacuation when needed. The valve mechanism is designed to enable rapid fluid transfer without requiring complex pump activation sequences, thus reducing response time delays

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

3Loss of time

If powerful pump devices are used to fill and empty bladders quickly, then response time is reduced, but the system becomes expensive and requires significant apparatus outlay

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefilling and evacuation timeVSAvoidpump device complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of timeVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent removes powerful pump devices from the system entirely, replacing them with simple manual valve mechanisms that achieve sufficient filling and evacuation speeds for the application without requiring complex, expensive pump apparatus

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The system uses the vehicle's existing pneumatic infrastructure and simple valve mechanisms to self-regulate bladder filling and evacuation without requiring external powerful pumps. The manual valve allows the system to service itself using available resources

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The system achieves response times of less than 5 seconds for complete filling or evacuation, enhancing the dynamics of active support by providing immediate and cost-effective sidewall adjustments, reducing idle times and supporting vehicle occupants more quickly than prior art solutions.

Implementation Method 1

a preload spring, in the form of a torsion spring, engages by a first spring portion on the stationary portion, and engages by a second spring portion on the second wing portion, of the lever portion, such that it exerts a preload force which pushes the first spring portion in the direction of the stationary portion

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectTorsion spring: Torsion Spring

Implementation Method 2

at least one fluid-fillable bladder which is arranged between the stationary portion and the lever portion for the purpose of adjusting the relative angular position thereof

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectFluid pressure: Pressure Increase

Data Source

PatentUS11794615B2Motor vehicle seat and motor vehicle seat system
Publication Date: 2023.10.24 FAURECIA AUTOSITZE
  • US11794615B2 patent drawing
  • US11794615B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A motor vehicle seat having a backrest and a seat part and an adjustable sidewall arranged on the backrest and/or the seat part, which sidewall comprises an adjustment mechanism having a stationary portion and a lever portion pivotable about a pivot axis, and having at least one fluid-fillable bladder arranged between the stationary portion and the lever portion for adjusting the relative angular position thereof, wherein the lever portion comprises two wing portions which are arranged on either side of the pivot axis, and the bladder is arranged between a first wing portion and the stationary portion, wherein a preload torsion spring engages by a first spring portion on the stationary portion, and engages by a second spring portion on the second wing portion, of the lever portion, such that it exerts a preload force which pushes the first spring portion in the direction of the stationary portion.