Seat Sliding Device Multi-Latch Locking Mechanism

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing seat sliding devices face challenges in enhancing lock strength while reducing weight, as they often require significant external forces to maintain the locking state and are prone to latch release due to moment-induced forces.

Innovation Solution

The seat sliding device incorporates a fixed rail with indentations and a movable rail featuring through-holes and latches, where the first latch serves as the main lock, with the second and third latches positioned at ends of the rail to reduce release moment and enhance lock strength, allowing for a lighter design by distributing external forces effectively across multiple engagement points.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If multiple latches are used to enhance lock strength, then the locking reliability improves, but the device weight increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvelocking reliabilityVSAvoiddevice weight
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSWeight of moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The locking mechanism is segmented into three separate latches (first, second, and third latches) distributed along the longitudinal axis. Each latch independently engages with corresponding indentations on the fixed rail, dividing the locking function into multiple segments that collectively enhance reliability while allowing each component to be optimized for minimal weight.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Each latch is positioned at a specific location along the longitudinal axis to optimize its individual function. The first latch is positioned to withstand the majority of external forces, while the second and third latches are positioned at ends to minimize release moments. This local optimization allows each latch to be designed with minimal thickness while maintaining overall locking reliability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

2Weight of moving object

If latch thickness is reduced to minimize weight, then the device weight decreases, but the lock strength is compromised

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedevice weightVSAvoidlock strength
Core Design Contradiction:
Weight of moving objectVSStrength

Solution Approach 1:

The locking function is segmented across three latches, allowing each latch to be thinner than a single latch would need to be to provide equivalent locking strength. The combined strength of multiple thin latches equals or exceeds that of a single thick latch, achieving weight reduction without compromising lock strength.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The locking strength of multiple thin latches is merged to provide the total required lock strength. By combining the strength contributions of three latches, each with minimal thickness, the system achieves the necessary lock strength while minimizing the weight that would result from using a single thicker latch.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

3Reliability

If the second and third latches are positioned far from the first latch, then the locking coverage increases, but the release moment increases causing latch release

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvelocking coverageVSAvoidlatch stability
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSStability of the object's composition

Solution Approach 1:

The positions of the second and third latches are locally optimized to be at the ends of the rail while maintaining appropriate distance from the first latch. This positioning provides maximum locking coverage at the extremes of the movable rail's travel range while keeping the distance sufficient to minimize release moments caused by deformation of the first latch.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

4Strength

If the first latch withstands most external forces, then the main locking function is achieved, but the second and third latches may release due to induced moments

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemain locking functionVSAvoidlatch engagement reliability
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

Each latch is given a specific local function: the first latch is positioned and dimensioned to withstand the majority of external forces applied to the movable rail, while the second and third latches are positioned at the ends to provide stability and prevent release. This differentiation of local functions ensures that the first latch's deformation does not cause release of the other latches.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The second and third latches are pre-positioned at the ends of the rail to counteract any release moments that may be induced by deformation of the first latch. Their positioning creates a stabilizing effect that prevents the chain reaction of latch release, acting in advance to counterbalance the harmful moments generated by the primary latch's load-bearing function.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #9Preliminary anti-action

Data Source

PatentUS10279708B2Seat sliding device
Publication Date: 2019.05.07 TOYOTA BOSHOKU KK
  • US10279708B2 patent drawing
  • US10279708B2 patent drawing
  • US10279708B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Provided is a seat sliding device that includes a fixed rail, a movable rail, a first latch, a second latch, and a third latch. The first latch serves as a main lock. The second latch is positioned a distance from the first latch along a longitudinal axis of the fixed rail, and the third latch is positioned a distance from the first latch along the longitudinal axis.