Non-Uniform Seat Support Post to Prevent Rotation and Ease Caster Mounting

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Table and seating systems, especially those used in schools, face issues with seat rotation and damage due to abuse, and the use of square tubular members complicates caster mounting, affecting balance and folding mechanisms.

Innovation Solution

A table and seating apparatus with seat supports having a non-uniform cross-section, featuring a circular lower section for caster mounting and a non-circular upper section to prevent rotation, using a crimped tubular construction for improved strength and ease of manufacturing.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of manufacture

If a round tubular support post is used for the seat, then the seat is lightweight and easy to manufacture, but the seat can rotate and be damaged by abuse

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveease of manufactureVSAvoidreliability
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The seat support post transitions from a symmetric round cross-section to an asymmetric non-circular cross-section (square, rectangular, or oval) in the upper portion. This asymmetric shape prevents rotation of the seat by providing complementary non-circular engagement surfaces that eliminate rotational freedom while maintaining structural integrity and resistance to abuse

Inventive Principle:
Principle #4Asymmetry

Solution Approach 2:

The seat support post is divided into two distinct segments: a lower round tubular portion for caster mounting and an upper non-circular portion for seat engagement. This segmentation allows the lower portion to maintain circular symmetry for easy caster attachment while the upper portion provides non-circular geometry to prevent seat rotation, resolving the contradiction between ease of manufacture and reliability

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

2Reliability

If a square tubular member is used as the frame to prevent seat rotation, then the seat cannot rotate, but caster mounting becomes complex requiring adapters or welding

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovereliabilityVSAvoiddevice complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The frame member is segmented into a lower circular portion for caster mounting and an upper non-circular portion for seat support. This segmentation eliminates the need for adapters or welding by providing both circular and non-circular geometries within a single continuous tubular member, reducing device complexity while maintaining reliability

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Different portions of the same tubular frame member have different cross-sectional geometries: the lower portion has a circular cross-section optimized for caster mounting, while the upper portion has a non-circular cross-section optimized for preventing seat rotation. This local differentiation of quality allows each portion to fulfill its specific function without requiring additional components

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

3Ease of manufacture

If adapters or welding are used to mount casters on square tubular members, then caster mounting is achieved, but the balance and folding mechanism are adversely affected

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveease of manufactureVSAvoidbalance
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSStability of the object's composition

Solution Approach 1:

The tubular frame member is segmented to provide a lower circular portion that directly receives the caster mounting pin, eliminating the need for adapters or welding. This direct mounting preserves the intended balance and folding mechanism functionality while maintaining ease of manufacture through simple geometric transitions

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

4Reliability

If a non-circular cross-section is used for the seat support, then seat rotation is prevented, but the caster mounting becomes difficult with round pins

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovereliabilityVSAvoidease of manufacture
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The seat support post is segmented into a lower round tubular portion for caster mounting and an upper non-circular portion for seat engagement. This segmentation allows the lower portion to maintain circular geometry for easy caster mounting with round pins, while the upper portion provides non-circular geometry to prevent seat rotation, resolving the contradiction between reliability and ease of manufacture

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Different portions of the seat support have different cross-sectional qualities: the lower portion has circular cross-section for caster compatibility, while the upper portion has non-circular cross-section for rotation prevention. This local quality differentiation allows each function to be optimized independently without compromising the other

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Data Source

PatentUS9101218B2Seating support system
Publication Date: 2015.08.11 SICO INC
  • US9101218B2 patent drawing
  • US9101218B2 patent drawing
  • US9101218B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A table and seating arrangement includes a table and seats positioned along at least one edge of the table. The seats define a cavity, at least a portion of the cavity having a non-circular cross-section. A frame supports the seat and the table and includes a seat support. The seat support has a non-uniform cross-section including a lower section having a substantially circular cross-section and an upper section having a non-circular cross section inserting into the cavity of the seat. A caster or glide element mounts to a bottom end of the lower section of the seat support.