Seat Support Geometry to Prevent Rotation and Ease Caster Mounting

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Table and seating systems face issues with seat rotation and damage due to round support posts, and the use of square tubular members complicates caster mounting, affecting balance and folding mechanisms in multi-purpose furniture, especially in environments like schools where abuse is common.

Innovation Solution

A table and seating apparatus with seat supports having a non-uniform cross-section, featuring a circular lower section for caster mounting and a non-circular upper section to prevent rotation, using a crimped tubular construction that aligns with a complementary square cavity in the seat to secure the seat, enhancing strength and ease of manufacturing.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Device complexity

If a round tubular support post is used, then the seat can be easily mounted and the structure is simple, but the seat can rotate and cause damage through twisting abuse

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvestructure simplicityVSAvoidseat rotation resistance
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The support post transitions from a round cross-section to a square cross-section at the upper portion where the seat mounts. This asymmetric geometric change prevents rotational movement of the seat while maintaining the simplicity of the tubular structure. The square geometry provides flat surfaces that engage with corresponding features on the seat, eliminating the rotation problem inherent with round posts.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #4Asymmetry

Solution Approach 2:

The support post is divided into two distinct segments: a lower round tubular portion for structural support and mobility, and an upper square portion for seat mounting. This segmentation allows each portion to fulfill its specific function optimally - the round portion allows for caster mounting and structural integrity, while the square portion prevents rotation at the seat interface.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

2Reliability

If a square tubular member is used to prevent rotation, then the seat cannot rotate, but casters require adapters or welding to mount which complicates the system

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveseat rotation preventionVSAvoidcaster mounting complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The support post is segmented into a lower round portion for caster mounting and an upper square portion for seat mounting. This allows conventional round casters to be mounted on the round lower portion without requiring adapters or welding, while the square upper portion independently prevents seat rotation. Each segment serves its specific function without compromising the other.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Different cross-sectional geometries are applied at different locations of the support post - round at the lower end for caster compatibility and square at the upper end for rotation prevention. This local differentiation of geometric properties allows the single support post to satisfy multiple conflicting requirements without adding system complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

3Reliability

If a square seat support with complementary square seat is used, then rotation is prevented, but the manufacturing complexity increases compared to round supports

Engineering Contradiction:
Improverotation preventionVSAvoidmanufacturing simplicity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The support post is manufactured as a single extruded tubular element with a geometric transition from round to square cross-section along its length. This segmentation approach allows the use of standard extrusion processes for the majority of the post, with the square portion formed during the same extrusion operation, maintaining manufacturing simplicity while achieving rotation prevention.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The cross-sectional geometry parameter of the tubular support post is changed along its length from circular to square. This parameter change is achieved through a single extrusion process that varies the die geometry along the extrusion direction, allowing both geometries to be produced in one operation without increasing manufacturing complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Data Source

PatentEP2595508B1Seating support system
Publication Date: 2016.08.17 SICO INC
  • EP2595508B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP2595508B1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP2595508B1 patent drawingFigure 3

AI summary

A table and seating arrangement (10) includes a table (12) and seats (22) positioned along at least one edge of the table. The seats define a cavity, at least a portion of the cavity (36) having a non-circular cross - section. A frame (14) supports the seat and the table and includes a seat support (24). The seat support has a non-uniform cross - section including a lower section having a substantially circular cross - section and an upper section having a non-circular cross section inserting into the cavity of the seat. A caster or glide element (50) mounts to a bottom end of the lower section of the seat support.