Aircraft Seat Track Fitting With Elastic Locking Stability

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing aircraft seat track fittings often experience unstable locking positions and insufficient clamping force, particularly under stress conditions such as vibration, due to inadequate locking systems and geometrical tolerances.

Innovation Solution

A seat track fitting design featuring a stud with a spacer and a locking mechanism comprising an elastic fitting with a U shape, connected by a resilient member, and an activation mechanism with pivotally coupled legs, allowing for tool-free locking and unlocking without requiring excessive force, and an overload path system to prevent damage.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If a locking system with a lever and hook is used to secure the seat to the track, then the seat can be locked in place, but the locking position becomes unstable under stress conditions such as vibration

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvelocking stabilityVSAvoidlocking position stability
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSStability of the object's composition

Solution Approach 1:

The locking mechanism transitions from a static lever-hook system to a dynamic spring-loaded system where the resilient member continuously applies clamping force. The spring effect allows the locking arms to dynamically adapt to vibrations and stress conditions while maintaining stable engagement with the track, preventing the locking position from becoming unstable.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The invention changes the physical state of the locking system by introducing elastic deformation through the resilient member. The spring effect transforms the rigid locking arms into flexible components that can deform elastically under stress, absorbing vibrations and maintaining reliable locking engagement without losing positional stability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Manufacturing precision

If a screw mechanism is used to generate clamping force, then infinite adjustment is possible to compensate for tolerances, but a hand tool is necessary and clamping torque must be controlled

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetolerance compensationVSAvoidtool requirement
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The resilient member serves itself by automatically generating the required clamping force through its spring effect. The system self-adjusts to compensate for geometrical tolerances between the seat attachment and track without requiring external tools or manual torque control, as the elastic deformation of the spring-loaded arms naturally accommodates tolerance variations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The invention replaces the screw mechanism (which requires manual operation and torque control) with a spring-loaded mechanical system. The resilient member substitutes the need for threaded fasteners and hand tools by using elastic potential energy to generate and maintain clamping force automatically upon installation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

3Device complexity

If no locking system is used, then the device complexity is reduced, but the clamping force and security are insufficient

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvelocking system complexityVSAvoidclamping force
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The locking mechanism is segmented into two functional components: the resilient member (spring-loaded arms) that generates clamping force, and the activation mechanism (trigger system) that controls locking and unlocking. This segmentation allows the system to achieve reliable clamping with a relatively simple structure, where each component has a specific function that contributes to overall effectiveness without excessive complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The design ensures secure attachment of the seat to the track with a stable clamping force, maintaining energy peak during stress conditions without the need for tools, and effectively compensates for geometrical tolerances, enhancing safety and ease of use.

Implementation Method 1

a locking mechanism comprising an elastic fitting (112) comprising an upper arm (116a) and a lower arm (116b) connected by a resilient member (120)

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElasticity: Elasticity

Implementation Method 2

an activation mechanism comprising an upper leg (124a) pivotally coupled to a lower leg (124b)

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectLever mechanism: Lever

Data Source

PatentUS10005558B2Track fitting for aircraft seats
Publication Date: 2018.06.26 SAFRAN SEATS
  • US10005558B2 patent drawing
  • US10005558B2 patent drawing
  • US10005558B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Described are seat track fittings (100) with a stud (102) having a spacer (104) separated from a lower flange (106), and a locking mechanism (110). The locking mechanism includes an elastic fitting (112) having an upper arm (116a) and a lower arm (116b) connected by a resilient member (120). An end of the upper arm and an end the lower arm are coupled to the stud, with the end of the upper arm positioned above the spacer, and the end of the lower arm positioned above the lower flange. An activation mechanism (114) is coupled to the elastic fitting to transition the seat track fitting between unloaded, unlocked, and locked positions.