Vehicle Seat Vibration Proof Structure with Directional Resistance

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing vibration proof structures for vehicle seats compromise seat rigidity, particularly at the rear side, due to the use of elastic members that absorb energy but fail to maintain high rigidity requirements.

Innovation Solution

A vibration proof structure for vehicle seats that includes a first and second member movable in specific directions, with restriction walls and resistance forces applied only in the forward direction to reduce vibrations while maintaining high rigidity in the rear direction by using disc springs and strategically positioned bolts and nuts to restrict movement in the rearward direction.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Object-affected harmful factors

If an elastic member is provided between the rod and the side frame to reduce vibrations, then vibration absorption is improved, but the rigidity of the seat deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovevibrationVSAvoidrigidity
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-affected harmful factorsVSStrength

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies different structural characteristics to different regions of the seat frame. The front side frame includes a rod with an elastic member for vibration absorption, while the rear side frame maintains a rigid structure without elastic members. This local differentiation allows the front to be vibration-resistant while the rear maintains high rigidity, resolving the contradiction between vibration absorption and overall structural strength.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

2Object-affected harmful factors

If an elastic member is arranged between components of the seat to reduce vibrations, then vibration absorption is improved, but the rigidity of the seat deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovevibrationVSAvoidstructural stability
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-affected harmful factorsVSStability of the object's composition

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements vibration reduction measures only in the front side frame where the rod is provided, while maintaining a stable rigid structure in the rear side frame. This localized approach allows vibration absorption where needed without compromising the overall structural stability required for seat safety and support.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

3Strength

If the seat requires the highest rigidity for the rear side, then structural strength is improved, but vibration proof performance deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improverigidity at rear sideVSAvoidvibration
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent recognizes that different regions of the seat have different functional requirements. The rear side frame is designed with high rigidity for structural strength and stability, while the front side frame incorporates the rod and elastic member for vibration absorption. This spatial differentiation of structural properties allows each region to optimize its performance for its specific function.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The seat frame is segmented into front and rear portions with different structural characteristics. The front side frame contains the rod and elastic member assembly for vibration proofing, while the rear side frame maintains a simple rigid structure. This segmentation allows independent optimization of vibration protection and structural rigidity in different zones.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The structure effectively reduces vibrations during forward movement and maintains high rigidity during rearward movement, ensuring the seat's stability and comfort by applying resistance forces only when necessary, thus enhancing the overall seating experience.

Implementation Method 1

a resistance force applying portion applying a resistance force to the first member moving in the first relative direction between the first restriction wall and the second restriction wall while not applying the resistance force to the first member moving in the second relative direction

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElasticity: Elasticity

Data Source

PatentUS9004437B2Vibration proof structure of seat apparatus for vehicle
Publication Date: 2015.04.14 AISIN SEIKI KK
  • US9004437B2 patent drawing
  • US9004437B2 patent drawing
  • US9004437B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A vibration proof structure of a seat apparatus for a vehicle, includes a first member and a second member movably arranged relative to each other in a first relative direction corresponding to a forward movement of a seat element in a front and rear direction of the vehicle and in a second relative direction corresponding to a rearward movement of the seat element in the front and rear direction, a first restriction wall restricting a relative movement of the first member to the second member in the first relative direction, a second restriction wall restricting the relative movement of the first member to the second member in the second relative direction, and a resistance force applying portion applying a resistance force to the first member moving in the first relative direction while not applying the resistance force to the first member moving in the second relative direction.