Aircraft Seatback Crush Zone Mechanism for HIC Reduction

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current aircraft passenger seat designs face a trade-off between weight reduction and safety, as they struggle to meet Head Injury Criterion (HIC) standards while maintaining seating capacity and comfort, often requiring extensive spacing or breakover mechanisms that limit seating arrangements.

Innovation Solution

The implementation of a passenger seat with a bezel and seatback that includes a slide mechanism and impact attenuator, which translates or pivots upon detecting emergency acceleration to create a crushable space, thereby absorbing impact loads and reducing head injury risk.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If seat spacing is increased to prevent head contact during crash, then passenger safety is improved, but seating capacity is reduced

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepassenger safetyVSAvoidseating capacity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The bezel is translated forward and the seatback is reclined to a predetermined angle before impact occurs, creating crushable space in advance. This preliminary positioning of components allows the seat to absorb impact energy more effectively without requiring increased spacing between seats, thereby maintaining seating capacity while improving safety

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The seatback and bezel are designed to be dynamically adjustable rather than fixed. The seatback can recline to different angles and the bezel can translate forward based on detected impact conditions, allowing the same seat structure to provide both normal seating function and crash protection without sacrificing seating density

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Reliability

If breakover mechanism is added to reduce head injury, then safety is improved, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvehead injury mitigationVSAvoidseat mechanism complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The breakover function is merged with the existing seatback recline mechanism. The same actuator that controls normal seatback reclining is used to pivot the seatback forward during crash events, eliminating the need for a separate breakover mechanism and reducing overall device complexity while maintaining head injury mitigation capability

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The seatback mechanism serves multiple functions: it provides normal reclining for passenger comfort during flight, and it pivots forward to create crushable space during crash events. This multi-functionality eliminates the need for dedicated crash protection mechanisms, reducing complexity while improving safety

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

3Weight of moving object

If seat weight is reduced for efficiency, then fuel efficiency is improved, but safety capabilities are compromised

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveseat weightVSAvoidsafety capabilities
Core Design Contradiction:
Weight of moving objectVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The heavy-duty crash protection features are activated only periodically when needed, not continuously. The actuators remain in a neutral position during normal flight, and only activate to translate the bezel or recline the seatback when crash conditions are detected, allowing the seat to maintain safety capabilities without the continuous weight penalty of permanently extended crash structures

Inventive Principle:
Principle #19Periodic action

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This solution effectively increases the crushable space within the seat, improving head-impact criteria by absorbing energy and reducing the force of impact, thus enhancing passenger safety while maintaining seating density and comfort.

Implementation Method 1

an accelerometer configured to generate a signal in response to detecting an acceleration indicative of an emergency event

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectAcceleration detection: Accelerometer

Implementation Method 2

the impact attenuator is configured to absorb an energy upon impact of the passenger with the bezel

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectEnergy absorption through deformation: Deformation

Data Source

PatentUS11827359B2Devices for HIC reduction
Publication Date: 2023.11.28 BE AEROSPACE INC
  • US11827359B2 patent drawing
  • US11827359B2 patent drawing
  • US11827359B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A passenger seat is described which satisfies a head-injury criterion (HIC). To satisfy the HIC, the passenger seat translates or pivots one or more components of the seatback towards a passenger sitting behind the passenger seat. By translating and/or pivoting the components of the seatback towards the passenger, a crush zone for the passenger seat may be increased, thereby increasing the impact time and correspondingly decreasing the forces felt by the passenger.