Seatback pocket

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

The existing seatback pocket assembly has a high number of parts, leading to increased cost and weight, as well as complex workmanship, which affects the product's quality and price competitiveness.

Innovation Solution

A compact assembly structure for the seatback pocket using a backboard, a pocket member with a hinge part, and an elastic member, reducing the number of parts to three, with the backboard and pocket member being injection molded for improved quality and cost-effectiveness.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If a traditional seatback pocket assembly with multiple parts (backboard, backboard covering, pocket covering, sub-pocket panel, main pocket panel, fixing stick, return spring) is used, then the quality, strength, and durability are improved, but the cost, weight, and manufacturing complexity increase

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovequalityVSAvoidnumber of parts
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent combines multiple separate components into an integrated injection-molded single piece. The backboard, backboard covering, pocket covering, sub-pocket panel, and main pocket panel are merged into one monolithic structure, eliminating the need for fixing sticks and reducing the number of parts while maintaining structural integrity and quality

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The single integrated component performs multiple functions that were previously distributed across separate parts: structural support, covering, pocket formation, and attachment mechanisms are all incorporated into one universal part, reducing complexity while maintaining reliability

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

2Strength

If multiple separate components are used to assemble the seatback pocket, then the structural strength and durability are improved, but the weight and manufacturing cost increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvestructural strengthVSAvoidweight
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSWeight of stationary object

Solution Approach 1:

Multiple components are merged into a single injection-molded part, eliminating the weight of fasteners, joints, and overlapping materials while maintaining structural strength through integrated design and continuous material structure

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The injection molding process uses composite material formulations that provide both strength and weight efficiency, creating a single-piece structure that achieves the required structural integrity without the additional weight of multiple assembled components

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

3Duration of action of stationary object

If multiple separate components are used for the seatback pocket assembly, then the durability is improved, but the manufacturing cost and workmanship complexity increase

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovedurabilityVSAvoidmanufacturing cost
Core Design Contradiction:
Duration of action of stationary objectVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The patent merges multiple manufacturing steps and assembly operations into a single injection molding process, eliminating the need for separate production of individual components and their subsequent assembly, thereby reducing manufacturing cost and complexity while maintaining durability

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The injection molding process performs preliminary actions by forming the complete multi-functional structure in one step, including integrated attachment features and pocket formations, eliminating the need for subsequent assembly operations and reducing manufacturing complexity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The reduced number of parts significantly decreases the cost and weight of the seatback pocket while maintaining quality and improving productivity through simplified manufacturing and injection molding.

Implementation Method 1

an elastic member connected between both ends of the pocket member and the backboard in a shape blocking sides of the pocket space, and being configured to provide an elastic restoring force with respect to a rotation direction of the pocket member of which the pocket space is expanded

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElastic restoring force: Elasticity

Data Source

PatentUS11607048B2Seatback pocket
Publication Date: 2023.03.21 HYUNDAI MOTOR CO LTD
  • US11607048B2 patent drawing
  • US11607048B2 patent drawing
  • US11607048B2 patent drawing

AI summary

In the present disclosure, a seatback pocket is introduced, which includes a backboard combined with a rear side of a seatback and including a hinge shaft provided at a lower end in left and right width directions; a pocket member having a hinge part formed at a lower end and combined with the hinge shaft through a hinge structure to be rotated based on the hinge shaft to provide a pocket space in a region facing the backboard; and an elastic member connected between both ends of the pocket member and the backboard in a shape blocking sides of the pocket space, and configured to provide an elastic restoring force with respect to a rotation direction of the pocket member.