Four-Bar Seating Linkage With Controlled Recline Stop

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing seating arrangements lack a durable and cost-effective design that efficiently supports user comfort while reducing manufacturing and labor costs, with complex mechanisms and high part counts contributing to increased costs and complexity.

Innovation Solution

A seating arrangement featuring a four-bar linkage mechanism with flexibly resilient shell members and rigid support members, allowing the back and seat to move between upright and reclined positions without compromising structural integrity or user support, and incorporating a control mechanism to synchronize movements and limit recline angles.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If complex mechanisms with high part counts are used, then user comfort and structural integrity are improved, but manufacturing costs and device complexity increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvestructural integrityVSAvoidmechanism complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent combines multiple functions into a single integrated mechanism. The four-bar linkage system merges seat support, backrest positioning, and recline control into one unified structure, eliminating the need for separate mechanisms for each function. This reduces part counts while maintaining structural integrity and user comfort.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The four-bar linkage mechanism serves multiple purposes simultaneously: it supports the seat, positions the backrest, controls recline angles, and provides structural stability. This multi-functionality reduces the overall number of components needed while maintaining reliable structural performance.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

2Reliability

If complex mechanisms with high part counts are used, then user comfort and structural integrity are improved, but manufacturing costs increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveuser comfortVSAvoidmanufacturing cost
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

By merging multiple functions into the four-bar linkage system, the patent reduces the total number of parts that need to be manufactured, assembled, and quality-checked. This simplification lowers manufacturing costs while maintaining the comfort and reliability benefits of a complex mechanism.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The mechanism is divided into modular components (first link member, second link member, third link member, fourth link member) that can be manufactured separately and assembled systematically. This segmentation allows for efficient manufacturing and assembly while maintaining the overall complexity needed for user comfort.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

3Duration of action of stationary object

If flexibly resilient members are used, then durability and operational life are improved, but manufacturing precision requirements increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveoperational lifeVSAvoidflexibility control precision
Core Design Contradiction:
Duration of action of stationary objectVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies flexibility selectively to specific link members (first, second, and third link members are flexibly resilient while the fourth is rigid). This local application of flexibility allows each component to be optimized for its specific function, reducing overall manufacturing precision requirements while extending operational life through controlled flexibility in critical areas.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The design provides a durable, cost-effective, and visually appealing seating solution that maintains user comfort and reduces part counts and manufacturing costs, while ensuring long-term operational life and ease of assembly.

Implementation Method 1

a first link member, a second link member, a third link member and a fourth link member that cooperate to form a deformable, flexibly resilient four-bar linkage

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectFour-bar linkage: Four-Bar Linkage

Implementation Method 2

The first link member, the second link member, the third link member and the fourth link member cooperate to form a linkage arrangement

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElasticity: Elasticity

Data Source

PatentUS10194750B2Seating arrangement
Publication Date: 2019.02.05 STEELCASE INC
  • US10194750B2 patent drawing
  • US10194750B2 patent drawing
  • US10194750B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A seating arrangement includes a seat arrangement that includes first, second, third and fourth link members coupled to one another, a back arrangement movable between an upright position and a reclined position and coupled to the seat arrangement such that the first link member moves between forward and rearward positions as the back arrangement is moved between the upright and reclined positions, and a stop arrangement including a stop link coupled to at least one of the first link member, the third link and the fourth link member such that the stop link moves with the associated link member as the back assembly moves between the upright and reclined positions, wherein travel of the stop link is limited with respect to the second link member thereby limiting a rearward movement of the back arrangement toward the reclined position.